There are some very interesting things about these “so called protests”
some of which is certainly political in nature.
However, what seems really interesting is that you have a park in new york that is owned by a private citizen, and it has been unlawfully occupied by what can only be described as ruffians that are somewhat short of humanity.
Warning this picture could be offensive to some Americans.
occupy nothing
Are they really that stupid?
To look at this kind of ignorance, and know the truth all you have to do is know this one thing.
The Tea party political movement, actually went back to work after they gathered to protest spending and an out of control government.
Still the gravy train is about to stop on this issue as the city of new york has finally had enough, some worry about what might happen, other worry about riots, but the truth is that it is time to put an end to this.
Does this prove that Americans are not safe to travel to Italy?
Should the State department issue a travel alert?
The thing here is that if you are an American you can depend that the state department will do nothing to help you, (allegedly)
The verdict is in, after four years in Jail, the American Woman, Amanda Knox, has been ordered released.
In so many ways, this young lady, was wrongly prosecuted, Cheers were heard in abundance From the People of Italy, all of whom rightly believed that justice has now been done.
It is amazing to watch this kind of news story when you see a weakness in the White House this kind of thing happens more often.
When no one fears you weakness makes them bold in what they may do.
It is truly a drama filled with relief for many including even allegedly the guards whom were holding her. You see so often that so many times we have such difficulty, when traveling outside the US, it would be an insane person who would choose to travel to an unfriendly country.
Well this is an interesting thing here and it is one that the media has not covered, (nothing unusual about that) however it is interesting to look at why they say that they dropped the charges, they allegedly said, (we do not believe the story of the accuser) so how can we expect a jury to believe her story, so are we expected to now believe that if the DA believes that someone is guilty regardless of any evidence or lack thereof, that they will continue to pursue a conviction?
Think about that for a moment.
Since when did the US justice system become a matter of beliefs regardless of evidence?
That really makes you think about the problems faced by the US system of justice it is really broken so badly that we have a district attorney that now has an opinion about beliefs?
Obviously something happened, and while it is within the discretion of the district attorney to proceed or not to proceed, how often do they proceed, when they believe that someone is guilty when they are actually innocent.
That is something that is a serious problem.
There are many legal problems that we see every day in America, a land where we have numerous military operations around the world yet we cannot find the time or the men to keep Americans living on the borders of the US safe at night.
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. — A federal judge temporarily blocked enforcement of Alabama’s new law cracking down on illegal immigration, ruling Monday that she needed more time to decide whether the law opposed by the Obama administration, church leaders and immigrant-rights groups is constitutional.
The brief order by U.S. District Judge Sharon L. Blackburn means the law won’t take effect as scheduled on Thursday. The ruling was cheered by opponents who have compared the law to old Jim Crow-era statutes against racial integration.
Blackburn didn’t address whether the law is constitutional, and she could still let all or parts of the law take effect later. The judge said she will issue a longer ruling by Sept. 28.
Instead, she said she needs more time to consider lawsuits filed by the Justice Department, private groups and individuals that claim the state is overstepping its bounds with the law.
When the people of any nation turn away from the truth to embrace a lie what will become of that nation?
Is the judge that ruled against the constitution and the people of the state of Alabama a racist?
Is this judge doing the will of the constitution at all?
In a news story Fox news reported that this judge allegedly thinks that she has the authority to challenge the constitution?
What kind of person would do this kind of thing at all?
What kind of person would say that the constitution is not correct?
What kind of person would go against the will of the people of Alabama?
It would seem to be that there are some that might find a job would be a good thing, however that may not be the truth for everyone, the end result may be something that has to be settled in court, but why is that? When Jobs are at risk? What can we do about it?
Received in an email may not represent the opinion of the owners or administrators, of this website.
The National Labor Relations Board just destroyed thousands of ballots.
I wish this was unexpected, but with the out-of-control Obama Labor Board, it’s exactly as we’ve feared and predicted.
As you know, the NLRB is bulldozing its way through workers’ rights and the Board’s own precedents to hand Big Labor as many new special privileges as it can before the 2012 elections.
– Plotting to eliminate thousands of Boeing jobs in Right to Work South Carolina.
– Proposing a scheme to ambush workers with union certification elections.
– Forcing its way into every workplace in the country with biased notices that serve as a roadmap to coerced unionization. The Obama Labor Board is on a war path against worker freedom. And the hits just keep on coming.
Last week, three former union lawyers on the National Labor Relations Board voted to overturn the Board’s pivotal 2007 ruling in Dana Corp.
The Foundation-won Dana case was one of the most important victories for workers’ rights at the Board in recent years, securing for employees the right to challenge union card check organizing campaigns with a secret ballot vote.
Workers often sign so-called “union authorization cards” due to union organizers’ intimidating tactics or even outright lies about what signing a card means.
In fact, many workers across the country — like the Dana Corp. workers from Albion, Indiana in this video — have used Dana elections to kick out unwanted unions, demonstrating the unreliability of card check instant organizing.
But now thousands of workers who cast secret ballots in similar elections won’t even have their votes counted. The NLRB is actually destroying the votes!
Big Labor’s Card Check Forced Unionism Bill stalled in Congress due to widespread opposition from the American public to eliminating the secret ballot — and incumbents who supported card check faced the wrath of the voters in the 2010 midterm elections.
So instead the union bosses turned to the NLRB — where Barack Obama conveniently installed former union lawyers.
Most notably, Obama installed former SEIU and AFL-CIO union lawyer Craig Becker as a recess appointee to the Board.
Becker infamously called the secret ballot “profoundly undemocratic” and in his time on the Board has repeatedly demonstrated his blatant pro-forced unionism bias and disregard for ethics.
In fact, Becker refused to recuse himself from the decision to overturn Dana even though he co-authored a brief for the AFL-CIO in the original case!
Overturning Dana on its own would be bad enough, but what makes it even more troubling is how it goes hand-in-hand with the Board’s other recent power grabs.
Take the proposed ambush elections rules, for instance.
If the rules are implemented, union operatives will be able to ambush workers with quick-snap elections just days after union organizers turn in “union authorization cards” from a mere 30 percent of the workforce.
And to make it even easier for union operatives to steamroll their way into workplaces, the Board would also force companies to hand over to union organizers the name, address, phone number, email address, and shift schedule of each employee, exposing workers to “home visits” and other intimidation tactics.
But if union bosses get wind of the possibility that they could lose the election by secret ballot, the new rules would allow them to withdraw their petition but save the personal contact information of each worker for a full-scale card check campaign at a later date.
By overturning Dana, the Obama Labor Board just eliminated the one protection remaining for workers against abusive card check campaigns.
In fact, the NLRB is making card check an even more powerful weapon against workers and job providers alike.
That’s why the National Right to Work Foundation will continue fighting back.
We’ve already blasted the decision to overturn Dana in the press, and Foundation attorneys are working on new legal challenges to card check forced unionism.
Your generous tax-deductible contributions make our legal aid and media outreach programs possible.
Card check isn’t dead yet. And the Obama Labor Board’s all-out assault on individual workers isn’t over either.
That’s why we must remain vigilant.
Sincerely,
Mark Mix
P.S. The Foundation relies completely on voluntary contributions from its supporters to provide free legal aid.
If you can, please chip in with a tax-deductible contribution of $10 or more today to support the Foundation’s programs.
The FTC has some interesting information available if you have not seen this you really need to watch this video.
When can we expect the existing laws for fast food franchises to be enforced at all?
My fellow advertisers, and webmasters, let me say that the time for truth in advertising is about to show up and for some in a really ugly way.
Yes, for years, we have had to endure the pictures of 2 foot hamburgers, (literally) that is just how big they are, and they are made from silicone, and other very unnatural ingredients. The days of showing hamburgers that look good to eat but are really not eatable as all are about to come to a screeching halt.
As you may be aware the FTC recently outlines its revisions, concerning guides to advertising, for the most part concerning endorsement and testimony, but there were a few other areas that seem to have received some attention.
The main thing is that it appears that at long last, since having these rules, laws, or what ever you want to call them that perhaps finally we the consumers, will actually see some of these companies that have been breaking, bending, folding and mutilating, these rules for so many years, actually have to stop deceptive advertising practices, perhaps an unintended consequence to some revisions in the FTC guides.
Would it not be ever so cool if they actually enforced the laws that we have now?
It is amazing how years and years ago they passed, these laws, yet, it just seems to go un enforced.
When a trial is presented in the media such as many of the recent most popular cases these days, including the OJ case, can the victims, get a fair trial?
What if the media were in charge of all court cases?
would we have firing squads enough to put the people to death?
Sounds crazy yes, but when you watch the news, you often see this idea that opinion is being presented as fact or something like a fact.
When you see the media only telling part of the story and they dont tell the entire story, then can anyone get a fair trial at all?
Remember a few years ago when the media was sure that this one particular accused suspect was guilty, well they went ape and they said all kinds of stuff about this guy and his family they made up stuff, (allegedly) and they talked about his mother, they said all kinds of bad things about this guy and how evil he was and how horrible his family was and how evil he was for having done all these evil things that the legal system had accused him of doing however, the thing was, years later, after the guy had been in jail for many years, he was proven innocent because the real killer was caught, and the DNA proved it that the guy that the media thought was guilty was actually innocent, yet, the guy went to jail and he spend many years of his life in jail, all because of what?
The media was so sure that he had done this thing, but what proof did they have?
When the prosecuting, attorneys, allegations that the guy was just guilty and that he would be proven to be guilty which they did and they put him in jail, but he was not guilty.
This makes you wonder about the issues that effect our legal system…
When you look at this kind of thing, you have to wonder, what is the deal and why is this news at all?
The case that has become a circus of people trying to get a seat and has every low life Ex judge
When you look at this womans face it is often allegedly that spittle flies out of her mouth allegedly hate, is spewed, venom, is protracted, why is that?
What has this woman against this family, other than an objective reporters opinion in dealing with reporting the news fair and balanced.
This is like watching Dallas back in the day, but really are we not talking about the life of a girl here, guilty or not, liar or not, she is hardly the evil person that the media is depicting her to be.
giving bobble headed opinions as allegedly the ignorant judge on Fox news that continues to
flame her way through the case, it is an interesting process one that you just have to wonder about.
Has the State of Florida wasted Tax payer money by pushing for the death penalty when the case is obviously circumstantial in every way allegedly, when you can go online and read leaked documents by the Orange Country Sheriffs office, When you can see video that Casey thought was private, when you see all these circumstances, you just have to shake your head and wonder about the state of Florida, is this the best use of the tax payers money?
The girl is obviously guilty of something, no doubt about that, but intentionally Murdering, the child, that is a stretch of the imagination, they have really not proven how the child died, nor have they proved that the child was really in the car or the back yard.
They have strong circumstantial evidence, but little of that, so really what do they have besides the media and the leaked documents, and all the strange behavior by the parents, lets not forget, that, remember when the parents were calling for help searching for the missing child?
Certainty they knew the circumstances of this case then…
No, the state has allegedly failed to prove that Casey did this intentionally, the jury may in fact you have to wonder just what the intention of the state is in this matter, I suppose it is clear they want to put her to death but they cant prove that she did it on purpose, and they need to be able to do that if they really want to put her to death, so why all this waste?
All the evidence points to neglect, and accidental means.
Is the state of Florida really this stupid? The prevailing opinion was that the state filed these overall arrogant charges in an attempt to force a confession, but wait is that no like coercion?
If a state on behalf of the people take a shop lifting case and charge the case as bank robbery is that not wrong?
This practice of over booking and charging cases far in excess of the crime they can prove seems to be something that Florida seems to allegedly enjoy doing, this is allegedly not only morally wrong but ethically wrong.
The United States Attorney should investigate this case and its boundaries against the constitution because this is becoming far too dangerous.
The state of Florida may be guilty of a number of crimes in its careless prosecution of this case.
More so when you consider that there is no real evidence linking the girl to any real crime.
Did the girl have a duty to protect and case for the child, of course but that is not what is happening here what is happening here is a death penalty case that does not rise to the level of a capitol case.
When that happens you have what amounts to legal malpractice.
It sort of makes you wonder just what those people living in Florida think about the people running their state.
Most people believe the girl is guilty and should be punished, and also it is alleged that many people feel that what ever happened it was an accident, and not done or planned out in advance, (one of the criteria for a capitol case) so you have to ask yourself this question, is Florida really the best place to retire after all?
When misconduct by the prosecution is allegedly so profound but never questioned, when circumstances prove that this was not planned, when everything points to accidental means yet the state pushes for execution, you have to wonder about the motives of the state.
One thing remains clear the girl is allegedly mentally ill, probably that is what cause this entire problem to begin with, so again if your thinking about moving to Florida or retiring to Florida you may want to think again, some day you might J walk and end up being charged with Grand theft Auto, sounds crazy but it is no less likely than what we have seen in this case.
Some one better investigate soon…
