Is google about to make a huge mistake?
Over the last few months Google has been quietly and allegedly terminating accounts, suspending ad words accounts, and doing so in a way that might actually be illegal?
Who would do something like that more so if your a company that says do no evil?
One thing may be about to change and it is something that you should be very aware about.
In so many ways, big corporate business is strangling the life out of the internet.
They are forcefully creating a situation where only large companies with more money to spend on advertising can be successful.
This is wrong…
When only large corporations are afforded the ability to advertise and the regular public as well as small business (mom and pop) business are excluded this is wrong.
In so many ways, allegedly google has done more evil than anyone even realizes, (allegedly)
When you think about SOPA you first think hey lets stop all these pirates online right but in reality it will not stop anything at all what it will do is allow corporations to shift the burden of proof from the plaintiff to a defendant, and it will create more problems for an already over burdened, legal system.
The truth is that we cannot afford this kind of stupidity in congress and this is the number one reason why you should vote these crooks in congress out of office.
learn more about what you should avoid in legal bills in congress.
Sign the petition to stop this attempt at massive corporations to ruin the internet for everyone.
Sopa is a lie from the pits of hell…
It is Evil and must be removed in all its forms.
We cannot allow congress to pretend to pass laws that are in the interest of corporations but pretend to be in the interest of the people.
We know its a lie, they know its a lie, they are sorry, but not for the right reasons, they are sorry that they got caught not giving a damn.
It would seem to be that there are some that might find a job would be a good thing, however that may not be the truth for everyone, the end result may be something that has to be settled in court, but why is that? When Jobs are at risk? What can we do about it?
Received in an email may not represent the opinion of the owners or administrators, of this website.
The National Labor Relations Board just destroyed thousands of ballots.
I wish this was unexpected, but with the out-of-control Obama Labor Board, it’s exactly as we’ve feared and predicted.
As you know, the NLRB is bulldozing its way through workers’ rights and the Board’s own precedents to hand Big Labor as many new special privileges as it can before the 2012 elections.
– Plotting to eliminate thousands of Boeing jobs in Right to Work South Carolina.
– Proposing a scheme to ambush workers with union certification elections.
– Forcing its way into every workplace in the country with biased notices that serve as a roadmap to coerced unionization. The Obama Labor Board is on a war path against worker freedom. And the hits just keep on coming.
Last week, three former union lawyers on the National Labor Relations Board voted to overturn the Board’s pivotal 2007 ruling in Dana Corp.
The Foundation-won Dana case was one of the most important victories for workers’ rights at the Board in recent years, securing for employees the right to challenge union card check organizing campaigns with a secret ballot vote.
Workers often sign so-called “union authorization cards” due to union organizers’ intimidating tactics or even outright lies about what signing a card means.
In fact, many workers across the country — like the Dana Corp. workers from Albion, Indiana in this video — have used Dana elections to kick out unwanted unions, demonstrating the unreliability of card check instant organizing.
But now thousands of workers who cast secret ballots in similar elections won’t even have their votes counted. The NLRB is actually destroying the votes!
Big Labor’s Card Check Forced Unionism Bill stalled in Congress due to widespread opposition from the American public to eliminating the secret ballot — and incumbents who supported card check faced the wrath of the voters in the 2010 midterm elections.
So instead the union bosses turned to the NLRB — where Barack Obama conveniently installed former union lawyers.
Most notably, Obama installed former SEIU and AFL-CIO union lawyer Craig Becker as a recess appointee to the Board.
Becker infamously called the secret ballot “profoundly undemocratic” and in his time on the Board has repeatedly demonstrated his blatant pro-forced unionism bias and disregard for ethics.
In fact, Becker refused to recuse himself from the decision to overturn Dana even though he co-authored a brief for the AFL-CIO in the original case!
Overturning Dana on its own would be bad enough, but what makes it even more troubling is how it goes hand-in-hand with the Board’s other recent power grabs.
Take the proposed ambush elections rules, for instance.
If the rules are implemented, union operatives will be able to ambush workers with quick-snap elections just days after union organizers turn in “union authorization cards” from a mere 30 percent of the workforce.
And to make it even easier for union operatives to steamroll their way into workplaces, the Board would also force companies to hand over to union organizers the name, address, phone number, email address, and shift schedule of each employee, exposing workers to “home visits” and other intimidation tactics.
But if union bosses get wind of the possibility that they could lose the election by secret ballot, the new rules would allow them to withdraw their petition but save the personal contact information of each worker for a full-scale card check campaign at a later date.
By overturning Dana, the Obama Labor Board just eliminated the one protection remaining for workers against abusive card check campaigns.
In fact, the NLRB is making card check an even more powerful weapon against workers and job providers alike.
That’s why the National Right to Work Foundation will continue fighting back.
We’ve already blasted the decision to overturn Dana in the press, and Foundation attorneys are working on new legal challenges to card check forced unionism.
Your generous tax-deductible contributions make our legal aid and media outreach programs possible.
Card check isn’t dead yet. And the Obama Labor Board’s all-out assault on individual workers isn’t over either.
That’s why we must remain vigilant.
Sincerely,
Mark Mix
P.S. The Foundation relies completely on voluntary contributions from its supporters to provide free legal aid.
If you can, please chip in with a tax-deductible contribution of $10 or more today to support the Foundation’s programs.
Did this judge make several mistakes in this case?
In so many ways, the legal system is just not working the way it should be working.
Should the Judge make statements that indicate that he has already made up his mind before the case has begun? Some wonder about the justice system, in California.
Should the Judge make statements that indicate that he has already made up his mind before the case has begun?
Some wonder about the justice system, in California.
Does anyone really care?
While it might be tempting to pile on and condemn Lindsey for her bad behavior, are there not thousands of other young women who have very nearly the same problems, minus the fame and money and perhaps looks, opps, well yes it is hard to compare her to other girls, but the behavior in many ways is identical, human nature rarely changes because of how one might look.
The question is not if she deserves to be punished for her alleged bad behavior but if she is being treated differently because of her fame and because of who she is. This is a problem because if she is being made an example for other famous people, then she is not being treated fairly.
Granted, she needs to grow up and act like an adult, but that is not something that society can control, just like you cannot tell a lion or a bear how to behave, they will do what they want, regardless of how you feel about it, still she is a woman and no longer the cute little girl she once was, and hopefully she will find a way to overcome her self destructive behavior.
Naturally it is easier to say it than to do it, but I can tell you one thing for sure, if she is able to survive and to adapt to this world, and if she is able to find that path that will help her to find true happiness without the need to engage in all this destructive behavior, then perhaps she will at some point just “wake up” some day and realize that living life the way she has been living it is just not making her happy.
There are other ways and other days, most of the time the true problem is that once you have had all the media attention and the very Un real lifestyle of the rich and infamous, or is that famous, well anyway you get it, right, once you have had all that it is hard to find yourself sitting in a court being talked down to by a bald older man whom you could likely by and sell ten times over, but does that really help?
Being a bureaucrat that threatens to do bad things to you because of who you are, well that is just plain wrong, even if she is also wrong, two wrongs do not make a right and you cannot force someone to do or to behave the way that you think they should behave just as no amount of talking can change what is happening in Egypt right now.. They will do what they want to do, if that means going home and sleeping in a real bed, then that is what they will do.
Do you think that people have the right to do what they want to do?
Do you think that the state should tell you what to eat, what to drink and how to live every aspect of your life?
In so many ways, change is such a large part of what we are however, in the end we are human and that has not changed.
What worked, one thousand years ago still is true, human nature has not changed, we are what we are and what we are is human.
Talk about rewriting history and attempting to dismantle the constitution.
School Prayer First Amendment Revision
School Prayer was removed from the U.S. public education system by attempting to change the meaning of the First Amendment through a number of court cases over several decades.
three of these cases in the early 1960′s: have produced a great deal of sadness over the years. Crime in schools have increased in every statistic.
Murder, by knifing, by guns, by assault, by drugs, is in so many ways directly tied to the attempt to rewrite history and the constitution.
It is an amazing thing when this nation started out as a nation founded in Christian values.
A nation founded by Christians is on the verge of destruction by a minority of people, allegedly less than 20 percent of people in the US, are not christian.
Yet, we allow them to remove the one thing that protected our children.
Source, “The Regent’s School Prayer” (Engel v. Vitale, 1962) The New York education system adopted a school prayer to be said before the start of each day’s classes. This prayer promoted good moral character, provided spiritual training, and helped combat juvenile delinquency. The regents wrote a school prayer that was non-sectarian or denominational. In fact, it was so bland that it became known as the “to whom it may concern prayer.” Here it is: “Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon thee, and we beg Thy blessings upon us, our parents, our teachers and our Country.”
Does that make any sense, well I suppose if your the movie character Forrest Gump then yes it does, but for the rest of us who live in the real world, legal probability has for many years been the standard that is until the last five or so years when legal verdicts have become something akin to reading a palm you just do not know what will happen next, and that is where experience and negotiating skills come in to play.
These days, what might be law is not what occurs, in most court rooms, some Judges have taken to riding the Bench to develop law, which has given rise to many different types of legally offensive situations where one mans opinions have over ruled the majority of the people.
This was never meant to be, it is not constitutional and it is not good jurisprudence.
Yet, we see evidence of this perversion not only in our court systems, but also in our highest court, The Supreme, court, has over the last 20 years slowly begun a partisan approach to the interpretation of the law this is not only dangerous but it eroding what this nation was built upon.
These days, the law is something that some people are playing fast and loose with considering the Duke case where, a man allowed his own personal opinion to create an incredible amount of liberality for both his profession and the town for which he worked for, it is not only disturbing to see this type of perversion of justice but it is becoming common place practice, forget about having any kind of real proof, none apparently is needed, they charge you and they can ruin your life, (allegedly) with no proof and unless you have deep pockets and a sense for justice you cannot prevail, as in anything in life if a man or a woman makes a mistake either in judgment or expression of personal proclivity, over common sense and the law, then that person should be made responsible for such damage as they bring to the public.
For the most part over the last 30 years, if criminal charges were brought against some one they were publicly presumed guilty, after all we trust our officials, but is that really the right thing to do?
In some ways, some seriously lacking legal pursuits have been brought before the people, it used to be a joke that you could get a ham sandwich indicted, in fact in a interview with an elderly woman who was in a grand jury some years ago, (not as long as you think) She related about how the prosecuting attorney would bring five cases at a time in front of the jury to vote upon.
Which was a serious concern to this lady and I can understand such concerns, as each should be carefully considered, not put before a group of tired senior citizens, of which several in the room were unable to read the written language, (no they were not illegal aliens) they were elderly senior citizens, and some of them were unable to read.
When you see this kind of thing happen in open court, and no one says a thing, you may see a few frowns when this kind of thing happens, but for the most part, people are afraid to say anything, because what if they found themselves being brought up on charges, true or not, you could end up loosing your house, your job, your life savings, all because of one corrupt individual.
So for the most part people remain silent, which is also disturbing, while you may watch the media and feel like you have all the facts, the truth is that news leaked to the media is very seldom accurate, which is another thing that is disturbing, the practice of trying cases in the media.
It is not fair it is often not accurate, but once it occurs do you really think that anyone will belive you are innocent after they get finished with you, you could find that along with everything else you have lost your good name as well as everything you own.
That should be the most disturbing thing of all.
Did you know that for most people having a legal problem is something that they will face at least three times in their lifetimes.
Pre-paid legal plans promote preventive law.
Many people believe they need the services of a lawyer, under a pre-paid legal service scheme, to solve a legal problem or resolve an intricate situation. Often, your lawyer’s most valuable help could be before you get involved in legal trouble.
When you sign up for a pre-paid legal plan, you have the right to unlimited toll-free telephone access to your attorney.
The sound advice and consultation given to you by your lawyer will help you take the necessary steps to detect and resolve any potential legal problems before they take more dangerous proportions. This is called in legal jargon “therapeutic jurisprudence” or “preventive law”.
Just as preventive medicine helps prevent disease by detecting their symptoms, preventive law helps prevent serious legal consequences by detecting early problems.
In an increasingly litigious society, there is real concern that assets you have worked long and hard to accumulate may be attacked by creditors and litigants, through no fault of your own. By the time a potential claim or liability is identified, it is too late to act.
A competent attorney’s advice is your best option to minimize your exposure to potential risks and protect yourself from legal problems getting out of
In many ways, the idea that the law has died is something that many would argue has already happened, some years ago if the truth be told, however, what really makes a mentor the trusted source of information for the young Lawyer.
No features available.
Why do you think people are like this, is it because they do not care or is it because they do not want you to care?
Is this the loss of freedom or is it, just what you should expect, when you have already lost your freedom?
What will you do? The answer for most people is nothing, because they are afraid but should that be the way it is?
Where are our protectors?
Where is the ACLU, where are the guardians of the law?
Have they fled, have they abandoned you?
A compact, fun-filled book that features entertaining facts and insights about life, love and the law! Not many books can address quitting your job or going to small-claims court — then recommend watching “Office Space” or cover how cases end up before Judge Judy. Your Little Legal Companion, our most engaging book yet, does this and much more! Covering everything from birth to death and everything in between in an easy-to-read “Top 10 list” format, you’ll find quick tips on: *going to
List Price: $ 9.95
Price:
