executive orders, constitutional
Is google about to make a huge mistake?
Over the last few months Google has been quietly and allegedly terminating accounts, suspending ad words accounts, and doing so in a way that might actually be illegal?
Who would do something like that more so if your a company that says do no evil?
One thing may be about to change and it is something that you should be very aware about.
In so many ways, big corporate business is strangling the life out of the internet.
They are forcefully creating a situation where only large companies with more money to spend on advertising can be successful.
This is wrong…
When only large corporations are afforded the ability to advertise and the regular public as well as small business (mom and pop) business are excluded this is wrong.
In so many ways, allegedly google has done more evil than anyone even realizes, (allegedly)
Categories: AARP, ACLU, car accident attornies, car accident lawyers, car wrecks, cigarette smoking, Class Actions, Classic Media, Constitutional Law, corporate, corrupt, corrupt badly trained police, corrupt judge, corrupt police Tags: Congress, Dictator, Executive Orders, Pathway, Stock Market, United States
Police Beat Man
This is just getting out of control what is going on in America.
Are we going to find our way out of this insanity and if so will the police be a help or a hurt.
Murder and Homicide, charges, what is going on now?
Youtube felony?
PLR content may become more valuable over time, in fact with the S978 so called youtube streaming video bill, (AKA) the ten strikes bill, would make it a felony to view upload and or other wise consume content that someone (anyone really) claims is their copyrighted content.
Which means, that the common practice of taking photos, online, using music in videos, using photos in videos, using video clips, that are online on youtube.com in mass quantity.
Literally over night about half or better of the millions of videos on youtube would have to be taken down and removed.
While they may loose this battle, (at least I hope they do) they will eventually pass a bill that criminalizes youtube videos. That means that you will need to have royalty free content, in your possession and you will need to have proof that the content is royalty free.
There are thousands and thousands of PLR photos out there, millions of music clips, being sold and some of those sellers are not even the owners of the music clips.
Words like
- youtube penalty
- youtube court
- youtube felony conviction
Could become the new way to land your self in prison, with estimates of current laws, and new laws, being produced by congress with their collective heads up their back ends, you have to wonder what they are thinking.
Millions of photos, in millions of templates, that are being sold as PLR where the actual authors of the art work were never compensated and never agreed to sell their work in the first place.
What if your buying products that are not being legally sold?
That could be a real problem, something to really seriously consider.
Learn more about legal issues that could soon be effecting you if your marketing online.
Categories: AARP, ACLU, Class Actions, Classic Media, constitution, Constitutional Law, corporate, corrupt, criminal law, youtube felony conviction Tags: Art Work, Collective Heads, Congress, Estimates, Felony Conviction, Marketing, Mass Quantity, Music Clips, New Laws, Possession, Proof, Royalty, Streaming Video, Strikes, Taking Photos, Templates, Upload, Using Music, Video Clips, youtube conviction, youtube royalty free products, Youtube Videos
FTC and internet disclosure
How much is enough and how much is too much…
The FTC would like to impose additional guides for online advertisers, which could lead to an equal protection challenge, is this the real direction that Washington wants to go?
I would hope to see equal protection for all consumers, both online and offline deceptive, advertisements on TV can be seen that promote subliminal methods of advertising, however it appears that enforcement may be an issue if disclosure is not required for all advertisers, not just internet advertisers, clear and conspicuous disclosure must apply to all advertisers, equally, including enforcement of the same standards.
I would hope that before such measures are taken to protect consumers online that there could be some measure of protection afforded the millions and millions of television viewers every day on cable TV, including loud and offensive commercials, that make use of excessive loudness and depict impossibly large food items, graphics and pictures, of pizza that are over 24 inches in diameter, yet, when the consumer goes to purchase the product, the actual product is often less than 12 inches with substantially less product and toppings.
Is this not deceptive advertising?
Another example is the 24 inch hamburger, that is shown in many fast food television commercials. Consumers may understand at some level that they are not going to actually get what they are seeing on that large screen, however, is it not deceptive to show such large depictions of food?
What about the psychological considerations of showing overly large food items on video commercials, in broadcast television?
The human Subconscious, is highly susceptible to conditioning, in video advertising, will the FTC begin to require clear and conspicuous disclosure for all forms of advertising,with such a large percentage of Americans now falling into the obese category, do we not have the duty to protect all consumers from messages that these types of commercials send to the consuming public?
I would like to understand the concern that is being directed at online advertisers and yet have no such precautions for protecting consumers that are exposed to deceptive video advertising, that use highly technical and sophisticated subliminal advertising methods, frame rates in excess of 120 frames per second often with highly suggestive use of graphics in video content, these things should be the concern of a highly motivated organization such as the FTC.
I would be in favor for such additional measures to protect consumers, if all broadcast media were also subject to the same disclosure requirements as what is currently being proposed for online advertising content, does it not make more sense to provide a safe experience for all consumers?
Clear and conspicuous, disclosures for Television Advertising must also apply to broadcast and be enforced not just applied to online advertisers.
It appears that what is proposed for online users is not being proposed for traditional media advertising, this is a real concern and should be examined as to why such provisions are not being equally examined.
These questions should be carefully considered and answered before we even consider the idea of proposing such disclosure and legal requirements for online advertisers.
Should we not apply the same protection for all consumers? Can we apply one set of guides for the internet yet ignore clearly deceptive advertising for broadcast advertisers, the same level of enforcement must be applied to both online
My question and concern, is will such disclosures be required of all commercial producers, Radio, Television, Cable, Internet.
If no such disclosure notices are proposed for broadcast advertisers, then this is something that is a serious issue and concern.
How can we not protect all consumers with the same passion and the same level of protection as the FTC guides propose for online consumers?
Should we not extend equal protection of all consumers? To apply, an unequal burden for online advertisers without providing equal enforcement for all advertisers. This is a question that we must answer before we consider these additional disclosure guides.
Categories: ACLU, bankruptcy, Class Actions, constitution, Constitutional Law, corrupt Tags: Additional Guides, Broadcast Television, Cable Tv, Conspicuous Disclosure, Deceptive Advertisements, Deceptive Advertising, Diameter, Fast Food, Food Items, Ftc, Internet Advertisers, Internet Disclosure, Loudness, Offensive Commercials, Psychological Considerations, Subconscious, Television Commercials, Television Viewers, Tv Commercials, Video Advertising, Video Commercials
Mesothelioma
This is perhaps one of the most under served conditions in existence even more so it is becoming a serious issue because of the new health care laws and the alleged, death panels.
Mesothelioma is a problem that is likely to be with us for many years, if you have ever worked in construction, you may have been exposed and it could take years for this disease to show up.
Most people believe they are safe at work but the reality is often different than what we think.
As long as there have been environmental factors with impact on our health as well as a legislative system, people have filed lawsuits if the impact has been of a negative kind.
Mesothelioma is a cancer primarily focused on the cells surrounding the lungs. This cancer has been associated exclusively with the exposure to asbestos which was commonly used in industrial and residential uses up until the late 1970′s. Thus, the victims of this severe disease have partly been workers of the construction and building industries or any industries where asbestos have been involved, but also ordinary residents of buildings containing this harmful material. Many people who were exposed to this material have suffered the devastating consequences and have joined together to file meseothelioma related lawsuits against former employers and manufacturers of asbestos.
If you believe you are suffering from this deadly disease you should carefully review the options available to you before deciding to join a joint lawsuit or class-action case. In many cases these types of lawsuits take years to settle and the victims will actually receive very little of the money, if any, awarded. Most of the money goes towards lawyer fees and court costs.
When you decide to pursue legal action it is best to start with a local attorney or family attorney if one is available. Ask them for referrals to other attorneys that handle these types of cases. They will most often know reputable lawyers who are out to help the victims instead of make profit off of other’s suffering. Remember, lawsuits of this nature may take several years to be resolved. If you are suffering serious medical problems currently it is strongly recommended that you focus your energy on fighting this awful cancer and worrying about lawsuits after you have regained some of your strength.
Categories: Class Actions Tags: Asbestos, Attorneys, Cells, Class Action Case, Consequences, Deadly Disease, Environmental Factors, Family Attorney, Harmful Material, Health, Lawsuits, Lawyer Fees, Lawyers, Legislative System, Lungs, Medical Problems, Mesothelioma, Mesothelioma Cancer, Money, Referrals, Safe At Work