executive orders, constitutional
Is it constitutional to force people to be insured for birth control?
Is it something that might be considered an attempt to exterminate a race?
It is legal at all?
The answer is no it is not legal, but some people are very happy that apparently the White House is unable to read the constitution or understand its contents.
In an election year, you might wonder just what were they thinking…
Who knows for sure one thing remains clear, Freedom and choice of religion, is something that cannot be overturned by a fiat…
some people think that this is just what the republicans need to win the election, the White House, and the Senate plus the House, there is a point at which a man must vote and this is that time.
Categories: AARP, ACLU, car accident attornies, car accident lawyers, car wrecks, cigarette smoking, Class Actions, Classic Media, Constitutional Law, corporate, corrupt, corrupt badly trained police, corrupt judge, corrupt police Tags: Congress, Dictator, Executive Orders, Pathway, Stock Market, United States
Youtube felony?
PLR content may become more valuable over time, in fact with the S978 so called youtube streaming video bill, (AKA) the ten strikes bill, would make it a felony to view upload and or other wise consume content that someone (anyone really) claims is their copyrighted content.
Which means, that the common practice of taking photos, online, using music in videos, using photos in videos, using video clips, that are online on youtube.com in mass quantity.
Literally over night about half or better of the millions of videos on youtube would have to be taken down and removed.
While they may loose this battle, (at least I hope they do) they will eventually pass a bill that criminalizes youtube videos. That means that you will need to have royalty free content, in your possession and you will need to have proof that the content is royalty free.
There are thousands and thousands of PLR photos out there, millions of music clips, being sold and some of those sellers are not even the owners of the music clips.
Words like
- youtube penalty
- youtube court
- youtube felony conviction
Could become the new way to land your self in prison, with estimates of current laws, and new laws, being produced by congress with their collective heads up their back ends, you have to wonder what they are thinking.
Millions of photos, in millions of templates, that are being sold as PLR where the actual authors of the art work were never compensated and never agreed to sell their work in the first place.
What if your buying products that are not being legally sold?
That could be a real problem, something to really seriously consider.
Learn more about legal issues that could soon be effecting you if your marketing online.
Categories: AARP, ACLU, Class Actions, Classic Media, constitution, Constitutional Law, corporate, corrupt, criminal law, youtube felony conviction Tags: Art Work, Collective Heads, Congress, Estimates, Felony Conviction, Marketing, Mass Quantity, Music Clips, New Laws, Possession, Proof, Royalty, Streaming Video, Strikes, Taking Photos, Templates, Upload, Using Music, Video Clips, youtube conviction, youtube royalty free products, Youtube Videos
Death Penalty
It has long been a controversial punishment and in the past it has been used on those that were actually innocent of the crime they were accused of doing. The problem with the death penalty is that unless there is eye witness or evidence beyond a doubt, (which has been said before) this level of punishment when the accused may be innocent of the charges is really extreme.
Where does it stop, this mob mentality that the media has for blood and gore.
I would ask about the sanity of these people that we trust for our news, but that might be asking too much even bill orielly comes across as a little twisted sometimes.
This fascination with death and the very likely accidental death of a child is a horrible thing beyond belief.
There is no evidence that the death of Caylee Anthony was anything but an accident.
Was the mother ignorant and stupid, yes, certainly but a planned murder, no that is just not possible in this case.
Even if it were possible, in this country you must have evidence to prove your allegations, otherwise your just using the power of the state to push an emotional agenda, What kind of mentality does it take to be able to push this type of life or death issue to the supreme court when there is no evidence that this child was murdered, in fact they have no evidence that suggests the child was murdered at all.
Everything about their case is circumstantial, from friends and ex boy friends coming in and testifying about partying and such that is not evidence that is hear say, but apparently if your living in Florida that is good enough.
I know one state I will not be retiring to and that is Florida, when the state cannot bring proper charges to support the evidence of a case then this is a real problem, for example here are some of the charges levied against this defendant.
capital murder, aggravated child abuse, aggravated manslaughter of a child and misleading law enforcement in the case of the death of her daughter, Caylee.
The prosecution is seeking the death penalty.
The have no proof, they have no evidence, they have nothing that suggests anything other than accidental death, and misleading law enforcement, but when someone is trying to kill you what would anyone do, this is why it is so important for the State to file charges only for what they can prove not what they can allege, by hearsay.
Again travel in Florida at your own risk you might end up J walking and being charged with murder.
Categories: ACLU, charlie sheen, Classic Media, corrupt, corrupt badly trained police, criminal law Tags: Accidental Death, Allegations, Belief, Bill Orielly, Boy Friends, Capital Murder, Caylee, Child Abuse, Death Issue, Death Of A Child, Death Penalty, Defendant, Doubt, Eye Witness, Fascination, Law Enforcement, Living In Florida, Manslaughter, Mob Mentality, Prosecution, Sanity
The Original Christmas Classics (Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer/Santa Claus Is Comin’ to Town/Frosty the Snowman/Frosty Returns/Mr. Magoo’s Christmas Carol/Little Drummer Boy/Cricket on the Hearth)
The Original Christmas Classics (Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer / Santa Claus Is Comin' to Town / Frosty the Snowman / Frosty Returns / Mr. Magoo's Christmas Carol / Little Drummer Boy / Cricket on the Hearth)
|
List Price: $29.93 Sale Price: $2.58 Availability: unspecified
|
Product Description
Rudolph the red-nose reindeer santa claus is comin to town frosty the snowman frosty returns the little drummer boy mr maggos christmas carol cricket on the hearth Studio: Genius Products Inc Release Date: 09/04/2007
Details
- ORIGINAL CHRISTMAS CLASSICS GIFT SET 07 (DVD MOVIE)
Categories: Classic Media Tags: Christmas, Christmas Carol, Christmas Classics, Christmas Reindeer, Cricket On The Hearth, Frosty Returns, Frosty The Snowman, Little Drummer Boy, Mr Magoo, Red Nosed Reindeer, Reindeer Santa, Rudolph Reindeer, Rudolph The Red Nosed, Rudolph The Red Nosed Reindeer, Santa Claus Is Comin To Town





fox news lies by omission
So is it fair?
Can there be a fair trial when you see websites like this one that are so convinced of what they “think” is the truth, the truth may be very different, the truth may not be known by even fox news, as good as they “think” that they are, they may be wrong, in fact the US justice system has been wrong in the past.
Can this girl get a fair trial at all?
When you have the media convinced of her guilt, most all of the bobble heads at fox news, and likely other news companies also, have said time and time again by action and by inference, that there are some issues that have not been addressed, do we not have a real working system of justice here?
Earlier we were witness, to a fox news commentator, that made a statement, about how they felt that the defense was trying to show a likely result.
There was no real fair and balanced view presented.
In fact there was only one view presented, that was the “we think that she is guilty view point”
When you look at the thought process, involved here you have to think about one thing and one thing alone, is this fair and is this balanced.
When you hear someone make a statement on national TV about how they think that the defense is trying to show reasonable doubt, and that there is no real reasonable doubt, (allegedly) they fail to make that correct impression, by only presented one point of view, it is not a fair thing to do, what if they are wrong, will they come out and apologize that they made allegedly stupid statements?
For example Phil Keating, talks about about what they “think” the defense is trying to do but he only makes one statement, that statement, is filled with invective, that calls for the conclusion of an alleged, verdict of guilty.
Just now on live TV, the bobble head, made the statement, of what the defense “hopes” to prove, this could be made differently you could say the defense may be trying to show that the use of a particular method of disposing of the body of a pet, might be something to consider in this case.
But they did not say that, they seem to be stuck using words that presume the idea of guilt.
You can use words to influence the thinking of anyone, for example while writing this article, I could use many different points or words to make a point, however, I choose to try to show a counter point, that is not happening on Fox news, the (Fair and balanced news company)
Is this fair and balanced coverage or is it just one sided?
Posted by lawsuit - July 28, 2011 at 8:48 pm
Categories: casey anthony, charlie sheen, Classic Media, criminal law, cyber law, evil doers, family law, florida injustice?, Foundation Press, get an attorney, Getting a Lawyer, gun control, Internet Law, is weiner a liar?, lawsuit, Lawsuit the Cops Tags: Bobble Head, Bobble Heads, Commentator, Conclusion, Correct Impression, Fox News, Guilt, Guilty View, Inference, Invective, Justice System, Live Tv, National Tv, Nbsp, Omission, Phil Keating, Point Of View, Reasonable Doubt, Stupid Statements, Thought Process, Truth