Just now we saw a story that aired on fox news where an offender had moved across from a school, yet there was nothing that could be done, that is just plain wrong…
While we know that currently a judge is not held accountable when they release a man like the gentleman that allegedly murdered three and possibly more young women in california?
It is apparent that the signs were in fact there, allegedly the doctor involved with the treatment of this man, allegedly stated that he would offend again, yet he was unleashed on these young ladies.
It is a tragic example of what happens when you ignore the warning signs.
Not only were these young women allegedly abducted during daylight hours but they thought they were safe, they thought that they could go jogging in public with out the fear of a predator walking the streets, did they have that expectation?
Perhaps not, at least now we know that it is not safe to do this at all.
But is this judge responsible for this?
Is this judge now responsible for people all over the USA feeling less safe?
Is it his fault that these three young women are no longer alive?
That is the question and it is really a good question, if a judge were held accountable how many of these predators would be released early? Probably not many…
Our children should be happy, they deserve to have the opportunity to live in a free society…
Is toyota doing all they can? In fact is it true that reports of Toyota dealers actually doing nothing but changing out the floor mats in many of these cars?
______________________________________________________
Did Toyoda use a false language barrier to deflect the crisis, on capitol hill?
Toyota lies, can you imagine if this was feudal Japan blood would be required, I for one am glad that is not the case but they need to do the right thing, is Paul Atkinson a LIAR? He comes on TV and talks about how they checked 6 automobiles, and they determined that there was no problem, 6 Really, they check 6 cars and find that they are ok.
That is just plain crazy.
We have one of these cars and we want this car fixed.
Yet Toyoda has still not admitted that they have a problem, We want to see some action.
The democrats say they will force their will on us, no matter what they way the issue is real, if they do reconciliation, it will be repealed.
Repeal anything that is not the will of the american people…
Why, is this happening?
Because it is illegal, because it is unconstitutional. So do what you have to do, and we the voters will repeal it, because that is what elections are for right?
Folks you had better pay attention because if you do not you may end up eating dog food out of a can.
just like the liberals you know the democrats have been saying the republicans were going to do for years…
Funny thing it was the democrats that cut social security…
Lets say you are a 19 year old male, and you pay for SSA taxes, all your life, it is called fica, yes that thing that takes most of your paycheck, so you pay those taxes which in reality is insurance, insurance that in case you get sick or if you get disabled you will not have to starve. The upside is that if you dont get sick then you live your life and you can enjoy the fruit of your labor.
The downside could be that later in your life when you need the this insurance, it may no longer be available.
Right now, we are seeing the first stages of the white house taking away the benefits that senior citizens and the very sick and disabled have now, that is right, you could end up paying all your life for health care and when you need it some great and popular leader will come along and take it away from you.
So you may be young now and you may not care much about what happens in politics, but you better be watching this because you could end up in the same place these old folks and these sick folks and these disabled people are in right now and that is the very real fact that democrats want to take away their social security benefits.
Watch and learn because, it used to be in every seniors mind that one day the republicans would take away their social security but guess what it is not the republicans that are doing it this time.
Now is the time to put the guilty parties away, they should be put in jail.
Ambulance chasers, and litigation idiots, you know the reason people are calling for tort reform…
Litigation terrorism? is this even possible?
This is certainly an unusual case, involving alleged behavior that would be entirely evil in most societal events. Auction houses, have long been a topic of disagreement in various venues however in this instance there have been a lot of troublesome issues, with some of the most interesting auctions and estates, it is certainly of interest to see some of the types of litigation that ensures in response to what appears to be a grasping of straws.
child perverts? what is going on with all this crazy stuff and why are they spying on kids. Is this legal? Are these people plenty stupid? Are they foolish? Are they dumb?
Have they even read the constitution, or do they know how to read?
You might wonder, if they understand it at all, for those who payed attention in civics, class, they call it a balance of power for a reason.
You would think that perhaps they have not, there is a reason the founding fathers made the constitution so that no one branch of power would have complete control over the government, it is the reason after all that we became a nation separate from where we came from.
Are they stupid?
Are they insane?
Are they Nuts?
Has the EPA as some suggest over stepped it boundary of power, by intentionally misinterpreting, a supreme court ruling?
Many fear that the EPA may make a serious mistake by trying to become a dictator?
What, no way the EPA would try something as stupid as that right, well some people think the supreme court makes policy.
What Again no way…
Because the supreme court does not make changes to the constitution.
So, consider that, Mr. EPA because the constitution says that you do not have to power to enforce your rule over America.
Rumors abound about lawsuits that will be filled soon against the EPA should they attempt to take over the Government by enforcing a mistaken ruling by the Supreme court, because the constitution is still the rule of law and even the supreme court does not have the right to supersede the constitution.
As well were you to ask the opinion of the Supreme court you would find that they never intended the EPA to attempt to enforce the ruling they made in the way they have interpreted it, In fact some argue that even now the court would hear a brief on the matter and rule accordingly.
So all you constitutional lawyers and scholars out there, step up to the plate, because it is time to make a name for yourself.
Have you been the victim of badly trained police…??? have you been treated badly…
Note this is not advise, it is only an opinion and as such may be subject to interoperation, always know that obeying the instructions of the law officer will help you…
If you have been a victim of police our of control, take action, find a lawyer, One thing you should always remember, if you are stopped, do so in a well lit area, as long as you can safely do so without causing a problem, note that trying to go more than a few hundred feet will probably cause you a problem.
Try to find other people around most of the time, attacks will not take place in front of a witness.
Yes, they have an impossible job, yes, it is tough, but they have to use common sense…
They have to be fair, or else they need to get out of the job…
Most of the time when something happens it is when you get them riled up, so co-operate, and get a lawyer later.
Is it legal for this current administration to delve into constitutional issues like this, to make up these guides as they go along? what rights do they have to police the internet, and if they do have those rights, how about going after some of the real criminals on the internet, believe me there are plenty of them around.
There may be some real concern, however for the most part, this is just a bunch of hooey…
Recently you may have seen or heard many people stating that your website would be removed and that you might go to jail if you don’t comply with the FTC ruling, in fact there are several products out there, (yes, there are people trying to cash in on this) just like most marketing situations, it is from a lack of understanding.
The first thing you should understand is that this is a guide concerning the use of endorsements and testimonials in advertising.
Naturally it sounds scary but in reality, it hardly ever would effect one of us, perhaps the vaunted perez hilton, but nah probably not, as he just thinks he is a celebrity.
Just kidding, if you are endorsing, a product or service, like in this example, I love this great tasting coffee, you should buy some too, now that would be an endorsement, however, just having a link with a steaming cup of hot coffee next to it is not an endorsement.
Unless you say something like this, I really like this great tasting coffee, you should buy some now, right now, your eyes are getting sleepy, (just kidding) but you get the idea.
As I have heard from a number of people it is better to be safe than sorry, ok sure, I understand, that feeling, in which case a small disclosure at the bottom of your blog or website might be good, but always if you are in doubt, check on it to make sure.
Never take the word of someone say endorsing a product that they are telling you the truth, because they may not be, it sort of fosters a lack of trust.
To be completely honest, I sincerely doubt that the FTC has time to police every single blogger out there if they did they would never have time to find the bernie madoff’s of the world…
Ok, another joke, sorry, but really and truly here is the actual and factual statement made by the FTC.
“The Guides are administrative interpretations of the law intended to help advertisers comply with the Federal Trade Commission Act; they are not binding law themselves. In any law enforcement action challenging the allegedly deceptive use of testimonials or endorsements, the Commission would have the burden of proving that the challenged conduct violates the FTC Act.” source www.ftc.gov Want to know why the preceding statement is so important, naturally because the FTC has no formal power to create law, that is for the legislative branch to do and to abide by the will of the people. Begin disclaimer. Just so you know, the FTC can cause you a lot of problems, but unless you are making say 200 thousand bucks a day or so blogging, (hey not even perez is doing that) LOL then chances are you have nothing to fear, but remember this is not advice and you should always consult with a professional in all situations where you are not clear about the law and the needs of the law. End disclaimer. It is a sad time in this country when we have an agency that is more concerned with the poor bloggers of the world than they are with the hucksters, like bernie madoff, when that kind of thing can go on and on and on, and no one ever figures it out, then people they have got a lot worse problems then us little bloggers, don’t ya think? This blogger may or may not receive some form of flattery from the preceeding statements, which may or may not be an opinion, only and so therefore and thus, we may or may not need to put this notice below. COMMERCIAL ENDORSEMENT DISCLAIMER Disclaimer of Endorsement: Reference herein to any trademark, proprietary product, or company name is intended for explicit description only and does not constitute or imply endorsement or recommendation
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
