Is an executive order still binding on the American people if it violates the Constitution? That may be one thing that many people wonder about…
Are we now living in a land where there is no longer a congress? Do we have a dictator and chief in office? When will congress act to secure the future of the United States?
Are we now living in a land where there is no longer a congress?
Do we have a dictator and chief in office?
When will congress act to secure the future of the United States?
In many ways we have some very troubling things happening all around us the stock market is very volatile.
Millions of Americans are out of work and yet we continue down the prickly pathway that has put us in danger of default.
Should the media be fair or protected at all, because times have changed the media may no longer be what they used to be…
Can anyone get a fair trial at all when the news media is only allegedly covering one side of the news story?
Is it possible that we may no longer need the justice system, since it appears that allegedly when in the state of Florida if the state does not have enough evidence to convict someone they allegedly leak details of the case to the media, they allegedly allow TV cameras in a death case, they allegedly allow all kinds of evidence in trials when it has not been done in cases like this in the past, did the state of Florida step over a line?
is this man really telling the truth or is he an alleged liar?
Why did this guy attempt suicide,
PLR content may become more valuable over time, in fact with the S978 so called youtube streaming video bill, (AKA) the ten strikes bill, would make it a felony to view upload and or other wise consume content that someone (anyone really) claims is their copyrighted content.
Which means, that the common practice of taking photos, online, using music in videos, using photos in videos, using video clips, that are online on youtube.com in mass quantity.
Literally over night about half or better of the millions of videos on youtube would have to be taken down and removed.
While they may loose this battle, (at least I hope they do) they will eventually pass a bill that criminalizes youtube videos. That means that you will need to have royalty free content, in your possession and you will need to have proof that the content is royalty free.
There are thousands and thousands of PLR photos out there, millions of music clips, being sold and some of those sellers are not even the owners of the music clips.
Words like
Could become the new way to land your self in prison, with estimates of current laws, and new laws, being produced by congress with their collective heads up their back ends, you have to wonder what they are thinking.
Millions of photos, in millions of templates, that are being sold as PLR where the actual authors of the art work were never compensated and never agreed to sell their work in the first place.
What if your buying products that are not being legally sold?
That could be a real problem, something to really seriously consider.
Learn more about legal issues that could soon be effecting you if your marketing online.
If you have been a victim of police corruption, find an attorney and sue the city.
Police violence.
Police problems.
Amazing stuff folks you just cannot make this kind of thing up period,
In fact I just cannot imagine why this guy still has a job, what is up with this kind of alleged ignorance.
Deception, is a big problem in Advertising these days and more so among Eating establishments and their commercials, you see pictures of Huge three foot Pizzas, 14 inch hamburgers, yet when you get to the restaurant you find that what you get is not the same thing as what you are shown. Is this not Deception? We see the keyword used all the time when the FTC goes after someone they think is being deceptive, totally subjective process for the most part, or is it? With regard to fake merchandise certainly it is easy to see that yes they are being deceptive however one has to wonder, about this entire subject, are restaurants being deceptive in showing the consumer a ten foot high product but when you go to buy that product, you find it is about four inches in diameter, not three feet in diameter, which bring up the question, does the consumer know that they are not going to get what is being show to them? Logically yes, they know they are not going to get a 12 inch hamburger… However here is the real question, does the subconscious human mind know this? Is it possible that some commercials are deceptive by the psychological nature of what they show to consumers. More importantly should the FTC step in to regulate this aspect of what is most certainly deceptive advertising practices? Did Taco Bell change its ways, or was the story really ever true? Well one thing for sure is this, Taco bell had little choice but to either change its practice of calling non beef (beef) or start calling it taco filling. Not a likely outcome… Remember the Wendy’s commercials all those year ago, Where’s the Beef, well apparently and allegedly you could say that again… Well folks you might have to wonder if there is any connection between the new FTC guides and Taco bell, but one thing is clear, A law firm in Alabama, (of all places) is allegedly happily filing a lawsuit,
Deception, is a big problem in Advertising these days and more so among Eating establishments and their commercials, you see pictures of Huge three foot Pizzas, 14 inch hamburgers, yet when you get to the restaurant you find that what you get is not the same thing as what you are shown.
We see the keyword used all the time when the FTC goes after someone they think is being deceptive, totally subjective process for the most part, or is it? With regard to fake merchandise certainly it is easy to see that yes they are being deceptive however one has to wonder, about this entire subject, are restaurants being deceptive in showing the consumer a ten foot high product but when you go to buy that product, you find it is about four inches in diameter, not three feet in diameter, which bring up the question, does the consumer know that they are not going to get what is being show to them? Logically yes, they know they are not going to get a 12 inch hamburger…
However here is the real question, does the subconscious human mind know this?
Is it possible that some commercials are deceptive by the psychological nature of what they show to consumers.
More importantly should the FTC step in to regulate this aspect of what is most certainly deceptive advertising practices?
Did Taco Bell change its ways, or was the story really ever true?
Well one thing for sure is this, Taco bell had little choice but to either change its practice of calling non beef (beef) or start calling it taco filling.
Not a likely outcome…
Remember the Wendy’s commercials all those year ago, Where’s the Beef, well apparently and allegedly you could say that again…
Well folks you might have to wonder if there is any connection between the new FTC guides and Taco bell, but one thing is clear,
A law firm in Alabama, (of all places) is allegedly happily filing a lawsuit,
allegedly, this is the alleged, ingredients, source, Gizmodo
Water, isolated oat product, salt, chili pepper, onion powder, tomato powder, oats (wheat), soy lecithin, sugar, spices, maltodextrin (a polysaccharide that is absorbed as glucose), soybean oil (anti-dusting agent), garlic powder, autolyzed yeast extract, citric acid, caramel color, cocoa powder, silicon dioxide (anti-caking agent), natural flavors, yeast, modified corn starch, natural smoke flavor, salt, sodium phosphate, less than 2% of beef broth, potassium phosphate, and potassium lactate.
Now, as the story goes, (allegedly) at Gizmodo, Taco bell cannot legally call its beef product, beef, yet, apparently they have been allegedly doing so in some commercials, or something like that, which should come as no surprise considering the results of eating at taco bell more than once per month, (allegedly)
All kidding aside, how are the new FTC guides effecting commercial advertising?
Why is it important?
How do you feel about it?
Is it about time that some action is taken with all of the commercials on TV, there is bound to be a healthy amount of skepticism, I know I sure think that, every day, when I see, a buy one suit at full price get 10 suits FREE, yet, we all know that your paying for those suits, or do we?
Perhaps, some do not, and that may be where this protection is needed, I know for sure that I am sick of seeing a three foot in diameter, pizza, on TV, and then when I go to pick up the pizza it turns out to be barely 14 inches, just for the math to work out right, lets add that up, 3 feet, that would be 36 inches.
Huge, pizza, right, well that my friends is not being honest, in fact the materials that these pizzas are allegedly made from is not food at all but silicone.
So, a disclaimer is in order, something like you of course know that this is not actually pizza at all but a silicone based over sized advertising tool to make you want to buy a pizza, what you may get may not actually even remotely resemble a pizza like the one your being shown.
But wait, would that not be bait and switch?
Perhaps and yes, Bingo, Yahtzee, you win the big prize.
You know it appears that advertising in our culture has long had a very shady element since the times of the carnival, barker who would yell and cajole, laugh and entertain you out of the few dollars and cents you might have in your pocket, advertising false or otherwise has been such a great part of the American culture, that separating it from our TV might be difficult, would it not be a novel idea to produce advertising that is actually accurate?
Only time will tell, it it might not be all that far off before your faced with a hamburger that actually resembles, what you would get if you went down and bought one, a pizza might soon start to look like you might get if you went down and purchased one.
Because to do otherwise, well folks that is just deceptive advertising and it is about time that some law firms start pulling the carpet out from under those jerky advertisers, right? Well, perhaps, I guess it depends on a lot of different things, you would think that in 50 years, that advertisers would have tired of trying to pull the wool over peoples eyes, but allegedly they have not and so the fight may be just warming up…
When will these Flea Bags learn that America is unique?
America is a nation that has overcome great challenges in the past.
Yes we have liberals in the Senate that try to pattern our way of life after the failed European style government that is a proven failure.
H.R. 1249 is a bill that is unconstitutional.
source, Fellow Citizen,
While Washington is busy arguing loudly and slowly about government shutdowns, Obama and his allies in both parties are being awfully quick and quiet about their plan to take away our Constitutional property rights and bail out their multinational corporate friends with trillions of dollars in new wealth transfers. The Orwellian name of this destructive legislation is the “America Invents Act” (H.R. 1249). We call it “ObamaPatent.” It’s unconstitutional; it will harm small business and innovation; and it will destroy jobs.
This is the most harmful and radical bill that the senate has ever tried to pull on the American people.
It is Evil and it must be defeated, we are not Europe, We are Americans, Shame on those senators that signed their names to this disgusting, American way of life killing bill.
This European style law is not constitutional and must be defeated if you like the idea that Thomas Edison was a great American inventor then you must help defeat this bill because had this been the law back then Thomas Edison would not have been able to have protected his inventions.
Simply put this would suppress and oppress the people of the united states in favor of only large corporations.
First to file means that if Joe the plumber invents a great plumbing tool, and AMCE, (made up name) files for a patent for a tool that is like Joes tool then ACME will be the patent holder, if this bill passes Billions of dollars in damages will occur, and the legal system will not even be able to do anything about it because it allegedly prevents lawsuits.
You know what this is horrible, I cannot understand what is going on in the senate are all those old farts senile?
Are they Stupid?
Are they so ignorant that they cannot understand that this is not Europe and that we do not want to follow in the failed Socialism of Europe.
There’s no time to lose. Join me today and help stop H.R. 1249 ObamaPatent:
Email me at defendmyrights@americasjobcreators.com. Put “Yes, I want to help stop ObamaPatent” in the subject line. I will follow up with you directly to coordinate our strategy.
The next day that Congress is open for business, call your Representative. Dial the U.S. House switchboard at (202) 224-3121 and ask for your Representative by name. Once you are connected to the office, ask for the staff member who handles patents. Tell him/her that H.R. 1249 America Invents Act is unconstitutional because it changes the patent system established in Article I Section 8 Clause 8 of the U.S. Constitution. Tell them to keep America’s Constitutional First-To-Invent patent system. Tell them you will be watching their vote on H.R. 1249, the America Invents Act. Tell them it’s time to stand up for the Constitution and for the creation of jobs we so desperately need.
OH my, lions tigers and bears, will the sky fall?
What is going to happen, will darkness descend upon the world?
Will the sky fall?
Do you have bill collectors that call you all the time, harassing you, yelling at you, using profanity, screaming, calling your mother or your father and screaming at them, abusing your friends at work.
caller ID spoofing is the practice of faking the origin header of a call to make it appear that the phone call is from someone other than the actual caller.
Who is at fault, the telemarketers, and scam artists, or the phone company.
Because I really want to know, when you get phone calls from people who are intent on committing fraud, by faking their caller ID data, (by the way its a federal crime to do this) Why are not we protected from this thread that costs billions of dollars per year paid for mostly by the elderly.
After all is it not the phone company that is allowing these calls to take place in the first place?
There are now companies that are getting hauled into court, because of the illegal practice of spoofing data transmitted across state lines, commonly known as caller ID.
Telemarketers have been spoofing Caller ID information in attempts to subvert and or commit fraud by wire line.
Yet, for the most part Telephone providers and or companies have done nothing to prevent this practice.
So, for you hungry lawyers out there, heads up because this is a big new story, if local telephone companies and larger regional companies are not doing everything they could be doing to prevent fraud by spoofed caller ID then this could be a great new revenue opening for the near future.
This is what you call reporting, no what this looks like allegedly is some kind of preparation for a biased attack filled with lies.
This is an amazing story, will they stop at nothing to retain the senate seat, they never earned? allegedly.
So what up with this, could this be a criminal act?
Is there some Law that prohibits undue influence in an election race?
