Imagine for a moment that your accused of a crime and you did not do it, but suddenly someone suggests that if you really have nothing to hide you take a lie detector test.
There are a lot of good reasons why you should not take one and yes that means even if your innocent of the accusation of a crime. The number one reason why is that it lies, the lie detector lies. Sounds a little crazy right, how can a lie detector that is allegedly designed to tell is someone is lying be the base of the lie.
There are a lot of good reasons why you should not take one and yes that means even if your innocent of the accusation of a crime.
The number one reason why is that it lies, the lie detector lies.
Sounds a little crazy right, how can a lie detector that is allegedly designed to tell is someone is lying be the base of the lie.
The reason why is simple it is not accurate, because it depends on a subjective analysis by a human operator.
Humans make mistakes, they sometimes even lie about what they are doing.
But even if a lie detector test were a valid and effective method of detecting a lie it is not admissible in court.
So if you ever find yourself in a situation where someone asks you to take a lie detector test, ask them one question, will the results of this testing eliminate me as a suspect and or arrest warrant? If they lie, then you know that you need a lawyer right away. If they tell the truth they will have to say that no, no matter what the test reveals it will not change anything about what we think we know about you.
So if you ever find yourself in a situation where someone asks you to take a lie detector test, ask them one question, will the results of this testing eliminate me as a suspect and or arrest warrant?
If they lie, then you know that you need a lawyer right away.
If they tell the truth they will have to say that no, no matter what the test reveals it will not change anything about what we think we know about you.
What that says is that it does not matter, if they think your guilty of a crime, they can have anyone come in and say that you failed or that you were not consistently honest.
But if they are honest and they say that your also honest the police will just say that a lie detector test is not conclusive and they will continue to waste your time and violate your rights, (allegedly)
The funny thing about a Lie Detector test is that its totally subjective, there are no scientific facts to support a lie detector, sorry but it just dont work.
It never has and it never will because it is subjective, the operator obtains his fee or his or her payment from law enforcement sources, which means they are not objective.
Until technology improves or we see some kind of real evidence that technology is capable of proving and sustaining honesty or dishonesty then sadly its just a waste of time and money.
The way that the Justice system is today it really leaves with just one choice, Never Ever Talk to them, because they will lie to you while they are telling you that when you lie to them they will get mad and angry. But they have no problem lying to you, what kind of Good guy does that?
Just remember that most of the time, they have more experience in putting you in jail than you have of getting out of jail.
Today more than ever the average citizen is in peril of being prosecuted and it is not as difficult as you may think to find yourself in legal hot water. Imagine what might happen if you were to find your self on a snow mobile, in a white out blizzard, you get lost and your just trying to survive, you see blue lights ahead and you head for those lights because the police are there to help right?
You would be wrong…
Guess what you just accidentally broke a federal statute, violation of the Wilderness Act.
Now you have a criminal record…
Most people think criminal law is for bad people,” says Timothy Lynch of the Cato Institute. “They’re one misstep away from the nightmare of a federal indictment.” new federal laws have lower standards for conviction than in the past: Prosecutors do not always need to show criminal intent (mens rea), according the Wall Street Journal. And, federal regulations (also numbering in the thousands) often carry the force of federal criminal law as penalty.
Most people think criminal law is for bad people,” says Timothy Lynch of the Cato Institute.
“They’re one misstep away from the nightmare of a federal indictment.”
new federal laws have lower standards for conviction than in the past: Prosecutors do not always need to show criminal intent (mens rea), according the Wall Street Journal. And, federal regulations (also numbering in the thousands) often carry the force of federal criminal law as penalty.
So, if your still reading this you may be wondering what is going on and is this really the America I grew up pledging allegiance to the flag?
Yes, it is, but things have changed, it has been said over and over again that we are a nation of laws, but the truth is that is a lie…
The truth is that we the people are the only people that matter in this Nation, yet our congress treats us like criminals.
While they eat the fat and drink the sweet, this is a real issue that every American should be well aware of yet for the most part many of us are far too busy working and living our lives to be concerned with legal issues, this is why it is imperative that you know what your doing and that when you choose to go on vacation or to go even on something as simple as a cruise that you know the laws that could effect your very liberty and freedom.
It may be difficult to understand when your not in the world as often as perhaps some of your neighbors, however its important to realize that just because your neighbors may not share information about being on vacation and accidentally breaking a federal law while in a federal park, getting a $3500.00 fine, having a felony record, (no more voting) all because what, your son who is interested in cowboys and Indians went looking for arrow heads, in a federal park…
You see, there are so many laws that some have said they do not know how many laws there actually are.
Some estimate the figure at more than 4500 federal laws.
If you are reading this because you were looking for legal advice or you perhaps found this website searching for a solution to a problem you have please locate an attorney, you can often get some sound legal advice for as little as $50 and that can go a long way towards helping you get a better nights sleep…
Ok, the one question I have that makes this difficult to understand is this, how can the State of Florida play games with the Law?
Think about this, The state of Floriduh, has decided that they want to pursue a charge they cannot prove at all, forget about reasonable doubt.
There is no reasonable doubt needed, simple because of the charges the State of Florida, decided to charge, but are they not smarter than that, allegedly just how stupid do you have to be to figure this out. And when you think about this you will partially understand just how dumb allegedly they are in Florida.
They have to prove that George Zimmerman, with a depraved intention, left his home intending to find and murder someone that he did not know.
They have to prove that George Zimmerman, knew that this young man was in the area, and that he intended to murder this man, the truth is that they cannot do that.
It is impossible because the young man did not live in this area, so sadly once again we see just how ignorant the state of florida is in this instance, along with others, like the Casey Anthony, trial, and the now infamous kidnapping case, where the state was made to look like fools.
I was actually born in this state, but now I am ashamed to say it, I mostly just say I am from the south,…
So, if your looking for a great place to retire, keep looking Florida is not the place you think it is.
Look Foriduh is at it again are we about to see yet another over reaching Floriduh, case, just like the Casey Anthony Case?
Millions and millions will be spent in this case, just because a middle aged women cannot figure out how to apply the law to the case, (allegedly)
There are many sides to this “Media Created” Circus, the public have been fed a diet of incorrect, inaccurate and inappropriate information that in the eyes of the public have done nothing to help create facts.
Florida, is a state, that is a problem, ok, if you live in this state, and you do something stupid, you could end up being charged with a felony when what you actually did was less of an offense.
Take for instance, the famous case where the state of Florida, charged, Casey Anthony with Murder, when Manslaughter would have been a more appropriate charge, in fact if they had done that Ms, Anthony would still be in jail today, this really tells a story about Floriduh.
But, is that fair?
It may be, the State of Florida has a reputation for over charging cases, in the hopes, (allegedly) that the defendant will feel pressured by the weight of the charges (Wait is this even ethical?) and succumb to the idea that they must go to jail even if they are not guilty. In this case, there is some reason to believe that the man made a horrible mistake that caused a loss of life, there are a number of things that might have been done that would have certainly produced better results, Proper Training, identification, uniforms, flashlights, all of these things could have been employed to reduce the amount of risk, yet none of them were done, (at this time it is not known for sure if these were part of the problem but we can see that it certainly would have reduced the risk) At least there will be a case, once again in Floriduh, where there will be much hype and likely all kinds of information released to the public. One thing that really makes you think, is this, “Is Floriduh, really the best place to live these days” That should make you think about what is going on both in the state level of government and in the local level of government.
It may be, the State of Florida has a reputation for over charging cases, in the hopes, (allegedly) that the defendant will feel pressured by the weight of the charges (Wait is this even ethical?) and succumb to the idea that they must go to jail even if they are not guilty.
In this case, there is some reason to believe that the man made a horrible mistake that caused a loss of life, there are a number of things that might have been done that would have certainly produced better results, Proper Training, identification, uniforms, flashlights, all of these things could have been employed to reduce the amount of risk, yet none of them were done, (at this time it is not known for sure if these were part of the problem but we can see that it certainly would have reduced the risk)
At least there will be a case, once again in Floriduh, where there will be much hype and likely all kinds of information released to the public.
One thing that really makes you think, is this, “Is Floriduh, really the best place to live these days” That should make you think about what is going on both in the state level of government and in the local level of government.
Perhaps its something in the water, or maybe its just human stupidity, who knows for sure, unless someone with some brains, (allegedly not the special prosecutor in this case) such as the Attorney General of the state of Florida, steps in and says, hey, you want a conviction or do you want another Casey Anthony trial?
Manslaughter is the more appropriate charge in this case, it is a charge that can be sustained, it is a charge that would result in significant time in jail, it is a charge that is likely appropriate, sometimes you look at the facts and you say how does a women with trial experience make such a huge mistake in judgement?
Who knows for sure, perhaps she is thinking about the book she will write after the trial is over and the media has gone home.
Perhaps she is thinking that she might run for political office later, perhaps she is thinking about the color of her nails, and getting her hair done, we don’t know, but it seems clear that she is not interested (allegedly) in justice or the peoples business, because charging in this manner is a career move not a criminal matter.
This is what is wrong with the American Legal System, its too political, perhaps it has always been that way but this is getting really stupid.
Is an executive order still binding on the American people if it violates the Constitution? That may be one thing that many people wonder about…
Are we now living in a land where there is no longer a congress? Do we have a dictator and chief in office? When will congress act to secure the future of the United States?
Are we now living in a land where there is no longer a congress?
Do we have a dictator and chief in office?
When will congress act to secure the future of the United States?
In many ways we have some very troubling things happening all around us the stock market is very volatile.
Millions of Americans are out of work and yet we continue down the prickly pathway that has put us in danger of default.
There are many legal problems that we see every day in America, a land where we have numerous military operations around the world yet we cannot find the time or the men to keep Americans living on the borders of the US safe at night.
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. — A federal judge temporarily blocked enforcement of Alabama’s new law cracking down on illegal immigration, ruling Monday that she needed more time to decide whether the law opposed by the Obama administration, church leaders and immigrant-rights groups is constitutional.
The brief order by U.S. District Judge Sharon L. Blackburn means the law won’t take effect as scheduled on Thursday. The ruling was cheered by opponents who have compared the law to old Jim Crow-era statutes against racial integration.
Blackburn didn’t address whether the law is constitutional, and she could still let all or parts of the law take effect later. The judge said she will issue a longer ruling by Sept. 28.
Instead, she said she needs more time to consider lawsuits filed by the Justice Department, private groups and individuals that claim the state is overstepping its bounds with the law.
