Youtube felony?
PLR content may become more valuable over time, in fact with the S978 so called youtube streaming video bill, (AKA) the ten strikes bill, would make it a felony to view upload and or other wise consume content that someone (anyone really) claims is their copyrighted content.
Which means, that the common practice of taking photos, online, using music in videos, using photos in videos, using video clips, that are online on youtube.com in mass quantity.
Literally over night about half or better of the millions of videos on youtube would have to be taken down and removed.
While they may loose this battle, (at least I hope they do) they will eventually pass a bill that criminalizes youtube videos. That means that you will need to have royalty free content, in your possession and you will need to have proof that the content is royalty free.
There are thousands and thousands of PLR photos out there, millions of music clips, being sold and some of those sellers are not even the owners of the music clips.
Words like
- youtube penalty
- youtube court
- youtube felony conviction
Could become the new way to land your self in prison, with estimates of current laws, and new laws, being produced by congress with their collective heads up their back ends, you have to wonder what they are thinking.
Millions of photos, in millions of templates, that are being sold as PLR where the actual authors of the art work were never compensated and never agreed to sell their work in the first place.
What if your buying products that are not being legally sold?
That could be a real problem, something to really seriously consider.
Learn more about legal issues that could soon be effecting you if your marketing online.
Categories: AARP, ACLU, Class Actions, Classic Media, constitution, Constitutional Law, corporate, corrupt, criminal law, youtube felony conviction Tags: Art Work, Collective Heads, Congress, Estimates, Felony Conviction, Marketing, Mass Quantity, Music Clips, New Laws, Possession, Proof, Royalty, Streaming Video, Strikes, Taking Photos, Templates, Upload, Using Music, Video Clips, youtube conviction, youtube royalty free products, Youtube Videos
Student Saves lives
College student shoots home invader, saves 10 lives
Yet another reason to keep a gun in the house . . .
gun control debate, well if you were one of those college students that were about to be murdered do you think you might have a different outlook?
In the first days of May, 2009, in the notoriously dangerous neighborhood of College Park in Atlanta, Georgia, two armed criminals broke into a house party of students.
After confiscating the group’s valuables, the invaders split the men and women up into different rooms.
Witnesses say the perpetrators then counted their rounds and discussed if they had “enough” ammunition.
The students believed the gunmen were going to rape and murder the entire group of students, who were celebrating a birthday at the end of the semester.
However, one male student, whose identity is being protected by police and local media, retrieved a handgun from his backpack and fired at the thug who was detaining the men.
(That is: One smart student had prepared for a night in College Park, Atlanta.)
The criminal fled the apartment under the threat of injury and never returned.
The student continued on into the girls’ room, found the other thug, 23-year-old Calvin Lavant, preparing to rape his first victim.
The student exchanged gunfire with Lavant, lethally wounding him in the process. Lavant fled through a window and died in front of his apartment, only one building away.
One of the female students was injured during the exchange, but doctors expect a full and complete recovery.
So what’s the point?
A student saved the girls from rape, and saved the whole group of 10 people (including himself) from murder . . . and he did it with a handgun.
This is a perfect example of how ludicrous “big city gun laws” are. What if this had happened in New York, Chicago, or any of the other big cities that criminalize their citizens’ self defense?
Yes, we would be reading an entirely different story — one so horrendous that we would shudder at the very words.
Either this whole group of friends would have been raped and murdered by these two sorry excuses for human beings . . . or the hero of this story would be facing prison time for firearm possession and murder.
And that’s exactly how gun-grabber Michael Bloomberg and his Mayors Against Illegal Guns want it.
Thankfully, however, Atlanta hasn’t outlawed self-defense yet. And since someone had a gun and was willing to use it, innocent life was preserved.
Congratulations to the unnamed hero of this story. You saved your friends’ lives.
In Liberty,
Dudley Brown
Executive Director
National Association for Gun Rights
Categories: ACLU, constitution, Constitutional Law, corrupt, corrupt badly trained police, corrupt police, criminal law, evil doers, Jail Tags: Ammunition, College Park, Complete Recovery, Dangerous Neighborhood, Different Outlook, Different Story, Female Students, First Victim, Girls Room, Gun Control Debate, Gun Laws, Gunfire, Gunmen, Handgun, House Party, Local Media, Perpetrators, Self Defense, Smart Student, Sorry Excuses, Thug, York Chicago
Death Penalty
It has long been a controversial punishment and in the past it has been used on those that were actually innocent of the crime they were accused of doing. The problem with the death penalty is that unless there is eye witness or evidence beyond a doubt, (which has been said before) this level of punishment when the accused may be innocent of the charges is really extreme.
Where does it stop, this mob mentality that the media has for blood and gore.
I would ask about the sanity of these people that we trust for our news, but that might be asking too much even bill orielly comes across as a little twisted sometimes.
This fascination with death and the very likely accidental death of a child is a horrible thing beyond belief.
There is no evidence that the death of Caylee Anthony was anything but an accident.
Was the mother ignorant and stupid, yes, certainly but a planned murder, no that is just not possible in this case.
Even if it were possible, in this country you must have evidence to prove your allegations, otherwise your just using the power of the state to push an emotional agenda, What kind of mentality does it take to be able to push this type of life or death issue to the supreme court when there is no evidence that this child was murdered, in fact they have no evidence that suggests the child was murdered at all.
Everything about their case is circumstantial, from friends and ex boy friends coming in and testifying about partying and such that is not evidence that is hear say, but apparently if your living in Florida that is good enough.
I know one state I will not be retiring to and that is Florida, when the state cannot bring proper charges to support the evidence of a case then this is a real problem, for example here are some of the charges levied against this defendant.
capital murder, aggravated child abuse, aggravated manslaughter of a child and misleading law enforcement in the case of the death of her daughter, Caylee.
The prosecution is seeking the death penalty.
The have no proof, they have no evidence, they have nothing that suggests anything other than accidental death, and misleading law enforcement, but when someone is trying to kill you what would anyone do, this is why it is so important for the State to file charges only for what they can prove not what they can allege, by hearsay.
Again travel in Florida at your own risk you might end up J walking and being charged with murder.
Categories: ACLU, charlie sheen, Classic Media, corrupt, corrupt badly trained police, criminal law Tags: Accidental Death, Allegations, Belief, Bill Orielly, Boy Friends, Capital Murder, Caylee, Child Abuse, Death Issue, Death Of A Child, Death Penalty, Defendant, Doubt, Eye Witness, Fascination, Law Enforcement, Living In Florida, Manslaughter, Mob Mentality, Prosecution, Sanity
is intent the same as crime?
There seems to be a new disposition among law enforcement and some rather odd District Attorneys, to apply the theory, valid or otherwise that if you think about it and you think that you are doing to do it then that is the same as doing it.
I know it is sort of difficult to wrap your mind around, but think about it this way what if you “thought” about committing a crime and you “thought” that you were going to do it, but at the last minute you changed your mind…
Remember the movie they made a while back with tom cruise  called minority report, where they have these all powerful psychic that can predict the future so the idea is if you think about it then your guilty.
That could be an alarming thing, considering that a lot of people think about doing things all the time but that does not mean they would act upon those thoughts.
This sort of attacks the innocent until proven guilty thing that has been a part of criminal law for centuries.
But what are we to do now that we have law enforcement that is creating a new way to charge people with crimes that they just think about…
If you are not worried about this then your insane because they could easily say that because you “think bout robbing a bank” then that is the same thing, as robing a bank.
That seems a little crazy, yes and it would be but that is what is happening in many instances, for example they had this girl in florida, (really bad place to visit because you might end up being charged with your own thoughts)
Florida they have this girl whom they setup and they “pretended” to be a “hit man” then they pretended, that they were going to kill someone, “here it comes” Â Now they tell this girl, that they “the pretend killers” Â who are pretending to be a killer, but are really a cop, that they are going to kill for real the girls husband, ” so they pretend to be a real hit man” Â and they pretend to be serious about what they are pretending to do.
Then they get the girl on video and they pretend to say that since we are pretending, we are going to pretend to give you one last chance to get out of this pretend crime, (that is before we charge you with a real crime) Â (again florida great place to not visit)
Then they “lie to the girl” Â and then they pretend to kill the husband, then they pretend that he is dead, Wow, that is a lot of pretending, now I ask you this, would that girl had actually done what they were pretending to do?
Probably not…
Categories: criminal law, cyber law Tags: Centuries, Cop, Crimes, criminal law, District Attorneys, Girl Video, Hit Man, Innocent, Instances, Killers, Last Minute, Law Enforcement, Minority Report, New Disposition, Real Girls, Tom Cruise
Government shut down?
OH my, lions tigers and bears, will the sky fall?
What is going to happen, will darkness descend upon the world?
Will the sky fall?
Categories: AARP, ACLU, bankruptcy, charlie sheen, corporate, criminal law, family law, francescaskitchen, Getting a Lawyer Tags: Bears, Darkness, Lions, Sky Fall, Tigers
political Lies and evil masked as media?
This is what you call reporting, no what this looks like allegedly is some kind of preparation for a biased attack filled with lies.
This is an amazing story, will they stop at nothing to retain the senate seat, they never earned? allegedly.
So what up with this, could this be a criminal act?
Is there some Law that prohibits undue influence in an election race?
Categories: corporate, criminal law Tags: Criminal Act, Election Race, Political Lies, Senate Seat, Undue Influence
fox news lies by omission
Legal issues
Follow the Money
executive orders, constitutional
Google adsense lawsuits?
legal help
Developing legal strategies
Is google about to make a huge mistake?
Over the last few months Google has been quietly and allegedly terminating accounts, suspending ad words accounts, and doing so in a way that might actually be illegal?
Who would do something like that more so if your a company that says do no evil?
One thing may be about to change and it is something that you should be very aware about.
In so many ways, big corporate business is strangling the life out of the internet.
They are forcefully creating a situation where only large companies with more money to spend on advertising can be successful.
This is wrong…
When only large corporations are afforded the ability to advertise and the regular public as well as small business (mom and pop) business are excluded this is wrong.
In so many ways, allegedly google has done more evil than anyone even realizes, (allegedly)
legal trouble
Posted by lawsuit - July 28, 2011 at 8:48 pm
Categories: casey anthony, charlie sheen, Classic Media, criminal law, cyber law, evil doers, family law, florida injustice?, Foundation Press, get an attorney, Getting a Lawyer, gun control, Internet Law, is weiner a liar?, lawsuit, Lawsuit the Cops Tags: Bobble Head, Bobble Heads, Commentator, Conclusion, Correct Impression, Fox News, Guilt, Guilty View, Inference, Invective, Justice System, Live Tv, National Tv, Nbsp, Omission, Phil Keating, Point Of View, Reasonable Doubt, Stupid Statements, Thought Process, Truth