There have been some uneasy cases recently and some news stories concerning the government and the internet, these stories which may be little more than rumors at this point however we have seen an ongoing effort over the last few years by the government going after the internet as a means of tax revenue.
Indeed there are many states that are now charging tax for online purchases.
This is very disturbing and if steps are not taken to stop this behavior the internet as we know it today will cease to exist, the internet is still in its infancy and will continue to be in a state of growth as long as the government stays out of its development.
The moment that we allow the government to begin to stifle growth online by trying to censor and regulate all the content online, we will have a problem that will deepen the already weakened economy.
So is it fair?
Can there be a fair trial when you see websites like this one that are so convinced of what they “think” is the truth, the truth may be very different, the truth may not be known by even fox news, as good as they “think” that they are, they may be wrong, in fact the US justice system has been wrong in the past.
Can this girl get a fair trial at all?
When you have the media convinced of her guilt, most all of the bobble heads at fox news, and likely other news companies also, have said time and time again by action and by inference, that there are some issues that have not been addressed, do we not have a real working system of justice here?
Earlier we were witness, to a fox news commentator, that made a statement, about how they felt that the defense was trying to show a likely result.
There was no real fair and balanced view presented.
In fact there was only one view presented, that was the “we think that she is guilty view point”
When you look at the thought process, involved here you have to think about one thing and one thing alone, is this fair and is this balanced.
When you hear someone make a statement on national TV about how they think that the defense is trying to show reasonable doubt, and that there is no real reasonable doubt, (allegedly) they fail to make that correct impression, by only presented one point of view, it is not a fair thing to do, what if they are wrong, will they come out and apologize that they made allegedly stupid statements?
For example Phil Keating, talks about about what they “think” the defense is trying to do but he only makes one statement, that statement, is filled with invective, that calls for the conclusion of an alleged, verdict of guilty.
Just now on live TV, the bobble head, made the statement, of what the defense “hopes” to prove, this could be made differently you could say the defense may be trying to show that the use of a particular method of disposing of the body of a pet, might be something to consider in this case.
But they did not say that, they seem to be stuck using words that presume the idea of guilt.
You can use words to influence the thinking of anyone, for example while writing this article, I could use many different points or words to make a point, however, I choose to try to show a counter point, that is not happening on Fox news, the (Fair and balanced news company)
Is this fair and balanced coverage or is it just one sided?
With the latest press about the constitutional or unconstitutional health care reform still on the chopping block one might consider if they are actually getting a decent value from their existing health care plan.
With so many plans and how it appears they go out of their way to make is confusing you just have to wonder, can we not have some protection from insurance companies that cannot seem to provide a better and more user friendly customer experience.
We have seen many new health care rules and regulations, but interestingly enough there seems to be little that actually helps the consumer, the customer and the patient get better care.
This is not only disturbing but it is and should be a crime.
Legal transcription service is about preparing legal documents from written or dictated information. It is the conversion of the spoken word into a printable form, such as the proceeding of a court hearing.
Here, the legal transcription service assist young or experienced attorneys to prepare for trials, documenting relevant facts and information pertaining to lawsuits, organizing and maintaining client files. The persons working for legal transcription service are trained and qualified in the entire range of legal branches, which include:
1. Court proceedings, 2. Licensed appeals, 3. Presentations, 4. Seminars and conferences, 5. Depositions, hearings, and judgments, 6. Evidence or legal argument.
The legal transcription service provides service to solicitors, firms, and attorneys. Legal transcription service includes both legal and paralegal services like transcribing letters, reports, and different types of correspondence that a solicitor firm handles in a day. The objective is accuracy, fast turnaround and quality reporting.
Legal transcription service should be reliable, prompt and cost effective which in turn will save the valuable time and money of lawyers, attorneys, and professionals. Legal transcription service should include:
1. Competitive pricing 2. Fast turnaround time 3. Good accuracy 4. Confidentiality
The primary responsibility of legal transcription service should be to provide cost-effective, timely response to transcription needs with a high quality finished documents. Clients should be assured of complete accuracy in content and spelling with editing and grammar correction.
Most importantly, legal transcription service should include a high level of confidentiality to assure the safety of sensitive information being held and processed with strict procedure and confidence.
As different areas of the country and different courts have slightly different formats, the legal transcription service should transcribe in all legal formats. For that, legal transcription service provider should be professional and expert in linguistic skills in specialized area.
If you subscribe to the latest and greatest legal drama, raising the bar is one of the most interesting dramas.
Get the dope on one of the more interesting legal dramas around, this is not your aunt judy oh no.
Go figure once again we see a lack of respect for the law in florida.
This is crazy, in floriduh, go figure, but here is one situation where a man who was accused of possession of rolaids spent three months in jail, what a mess and there is something really crazy about floridah law enforcement.
One thing for sure you may want to re-consider your vacation to floriduh if they don’t get a hold of these problem prosecutors and law enforcement officers.
Anyone talking to this guy would know that he is not a drug user, yet, the justice system completely broke down in this instance, I just cant believe that no one was able to take a common sense look at this situation and understand that this guy was not a drug user.
Police have a hard job but come on folks this is getting out of hand, tourism in floriduh is going to suffer if t his kind of stupid stuff is not nipped in the bud, so to speak, This guy was obviously not a drug user and even if the police man made a mistake the ADA should have seen that this guy was not a user.
I know one thing there are thousands of people out there using rolaids and if police cant tell the difference then people and tourists in Florida are in for a rough ride.
So now what will happen next, well the state of Florida will pay a settlement and it will not be cheap, and that money will be tax dollars, People if this happens to you get a good lawyer, if this guy had a good lawyer to begin with none of this would have happened.
It is good to see that this guy now has a good lawyer.
If this ever happens to you, get a lawyer, for Gods sake, do not sit in jail over a bad lawyer.
This is some crazy stuff.
this story tells it all, yet the media can only cover Michael Vick, who paid his dept. to society.
You have to wonder what the heck is going on in America when Michael Vick is the number one story but this story is not covered.
In a tragic end to an otherwise peaceful traffic stop, yet another man has been killed by a police man on duty.
This is a real problem, not only because this is a wrongful death, but because there are serious implications involved in the idea that a police man has the right to choke and or break a suspects neck until they are dead.
Something is wrong in our police system when this happens over and over again, it is all about how that officer is trained to respond and how that officer is trained to deal with a conflict, obviously something needs to chance otherwise a good attorney will take the local towns to court and sue them into bankruptcy.
That may sound like some comfort knowing that someone will have to pay a price for what the police are doing to people, however, we have the duty to ask one simple question, here, was it preventable?
Could this have been prevented? The answer a resounding YES.
There are a lot of questions about this particular encounter however if you search on the internet you can find hundreds of these complaints every day, yet for the most part they are ignored, this is wrong and needs to change, if you have been the victim of the police, call an attorney and file a lawsuit, this is the only way that this unacceptable behavior will ever change because so far the police think that they can do anything and have no price to pay even when a suspect dies during a traffic stop, which is something that should never happen, yet over the last 2 months we have seen some very disturbing behavior.
The end result is that you must get an attorney if you have been a victim of a police crime.
Is UPS engaging in an alleged insurance scam? Or are they doing something different, some say they are allegedly paying insurance claims based on who you are and not on the circumstances of the claim.
After looking through several alleged complaints from consumers and seeing first hand what can happen
to packages at times using this service.
We did a search online for problems associated with UPS and its package delivery services.
There were a number of complaints which appear to be related to insurance and some have complained that this is actually insurance fraud, however, that is alleged at this point, there may also be some class action lawsuits out there that are in the process of being filed over the handling of packages.
The first thing that apparently happens is that your claim is automatically denied this is even before anyone sees or inspects the package, which is dishonest at best and a lie at the worst.
But that is just an opinion, or is it, because we recently shipped a package which was returned by the consignee, Stating that the unit had been damaged and in fact after we inspected the package it was in fact so damaged that it did not even resemble the package that we shipped.
UPS stated that they would not cover any damage because it was not packaged according to their standards.
However, we did package the item according to the standards that they published and we found that this is a common excuse for not paying a claim, we have pictures before and after, and you will not believe the mess that they caused, and the condition of the package, it was obviously run over by a fork lift.
WHAT? you have to ask that right, ok someone hit my package with a forklift and caused about $400.00 in damages and they say they are not going to pay for anything, they damaged the package beyond repair and feel no responsibility to do anything, that is sick my friends.
UPS apparently is having many of these problems, with regard to how the packages are handled.
So we plan on filing suit in Federal Court for violations of the UCC Uniform Commercial Code in relation to possible fraud in insurance and regulations regarding
bailment for hire.
Why does UPS do its customers dirty and do they cheat their customers out of the service they claim they provide.?
If you cannot afford an attorney and want to learn more about how you can defend yourself then you should definitely take a look at this company.
Are we on the brink of insanity?
Recently we have seen some very unusual situations that defy the constitutional levity of america and Over the last few months we have seen some very interesting legal situations that have arisen, in fact in a recent supreme court decision, a lower court was handed its arse in a hand-basket.
Legislation from the bench is not ethical nor is it constitutional.
You have to wonder about these types of situations, because as it is so often taught in law schools, the law is in the words not the thoughts or feelings of the judges.
Many attorneys are starting to realize that there is a need to challenge the constitutional legality of some of the recent decisions that have been made by this present administration.
This is a very disturbing situation however, the supreme court will be hearing more as we go along because it is apparent that the constitution is being trampled on by the government and it will be up to the legal community to do the right thing here and the right thing is also going to be the legal thing.
Will you be one of those attorneys that challenge the constitutionality of these recent judicial activism decisions that are headed to the supreme court?
Find books on the constitution here
