Did one judge go against more than 200 years of history and legal understanding?

I heard one person say that what has been done here, is about the same as treason, in fact if this judges decision had been handed down in the 16th century, the consequences would have been grave, perhaps even dire.

Legislating from the bench is allegedly the same as treason, and it is a shame on the profession.

When men are not willing to act to protect our constitution what are we to do?

They are throwing the constitution out the window, and they should be ashamed…

But they are not, they are disparaging our history, they should care but they do not…

Apparently our judges have forgotten what little they once knew about the constitution, are we even living in the US anymore?

The Tenth Amendment (Amendment X) to the United States Constitution, which is part of the Bill of Rights, was ratified on December 15, 1791.

The Tenth Amendment restates the Constitution’s principle of federalism by providing that powers not granted to the national government nor prohibited to the states by the Constitution of the United States are reserved to the states or the people.
source Wikipedia

As well please find some case law also from the wiki site, which is good reading for those judges that are too ignorant to understand case law.

It is amazing that we have one person that decides to over rule more than a decade of case law which is clear.

History and case law

The Tenth Amendment is similar to an earlier provision of the Articles of Confederation: “Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled.”[1] After the Constitution was ratified, some wanted to add a similar amendment limiting the federal government to powers “expressly” delegated, which would have denied implied powers.[2] However, the word “expressly” ultimately did not appear in the Tenth Amendment as ratified, and therefore the Tenth Amendment did not amend the Necessary and Proper Clause.

The Tenth Amendment, which makes explicit the idea that the federal government is limited only to the powers granted in the Constitution, is generally recognized to be a truism. In United States v. Sprague (1931) the Supreme Court noted that the amendment “added nothing to the [Constitution] as originally ratified.”

States and local governments have occasionally attempted to assert exemption from various federal regulations, especially in the areas of labor and environmental controls, using the Tenth Amendment as a basis for their claim. An often-repeated quote, from United States v. Darby, 312 U.S. 100, 124 (1941), source wikipedia site

It is amazing that we have morons, sitting in our court houses and they do not have handcuffs on.

Yes, Virginia, you can celebrate CHRISTmas. I know it is so last century, but guess what, it is the reason for the season and in this United States of America, we still are free under the constitution,

The First Amendment to the Constitution of the united states of america.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

For millions of Americans all over the world, freedom is worth it all, many of us have sacrificed, family members, for our freedom, sacrificed our childhood, for the freedom you enjoy, it is this freedom that allows, many the freedom to carry a sign around, so make a liberal crazy and wish them a merry Christmas.

In the balloon boy case, we saw that sometimes the media is actually pulling the strings.

Now that sounds like insanity, right and it is.

Just like in the case where the media influences the outcome of an election or in the case where the media influences only for one side or the other, it can be wrong, however, when you have more than one side in any given situation then you have to realize that the media should in fact be subject to some regulation.

However, that being said, we need the media to report the truth even if sometimes they get it wrong.

Because if not for the media would we not be subject to the tyranny of small men?

We may not always agree with the way the media reports, some for liberals some for conservative but we need them and if we do not watch very carefully and defend the constitution of the United States of America then eventually we will be lost in a country that belongs to everyone but us.

We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Are you sick of your right being treaded on? Are you tired of being pushed into a corner?

If you are sick of all the harassing phone calls, sick of being lied to, sick of all the garbage being thrown at you then it is time to get a lawyer.

Would you like to have a video like this? you can just contact us for information on how you can get your video listed here or have a video made for you to list here and other places online.

Or is it that they have a really though job and they just do not know how to successfully deal with this type of stress on the job?

We have to ask because of the recent “Stupidly” comments by our president is in my opinion right on.

It is stupid, to arrest a man in his own property… Even if he is upset and giving some feedback…

Why because you could just walk away!   Yes, amazing I know but yes, when the police are on private property they can just walk away and find another situation that is much more deserving of their hard work and time.

If the police showed up on your door step and starting treating you like a criminal, how would you react?

There is much to be learned, here, no matter how you stack it up and even if they all go to the white house and sing songs and drink beer, the police should have handled it differently why?

Because in recent years the police have been over steeping their authority in ways that are very disturbing, in ways that violate the constitution of the united states, but we looked the other way because of 911 and that was perhaps a good thing, however, now there are a lot of these so called big cases where, it has become easier to arrest a person for buying drugs than it is to arrest the drug dealer, we find that disturbing and we look to the white house for a solution to this problem.

So after all that we have learned, I have to agree, yes,

It is stupid to allow the situation to get so far out of control, when it could have been avoided by just a little diplomacy…

The problem here is that for some reason the police have come to believe that they can do anything and get away with it.

It sometimes looks like we are in a police state and if that is happening it needs to stop…

WE are not a police state and the police need to be reminded that people run the government not the police.