<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>legal aid &#187; Constitution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://typeofattorney.com/tag/constitution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://typeofattorney.com</link>
	<description>legal help</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 08:44:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Thomas Paine on to Washington</title>
		<link>http://typeofattorney.com/thomas-paine-on-to-washington/</link>
		<comments>http://typeofattorney.com/thomas-paine-on-to-washington/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lawsuit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impersonation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Paine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://typeofattorney.com/?p=183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On to washington this is an excellent actor who does a great impersonation of Thomas Paine]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On to washington this is an excellent actor who does a great impersonation of<br />
Thomas Paine</p>
<p><!--adsense--></p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/le2OnDKqj3g&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/le2OnDKqj3g&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p><!--adsense--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://typeofattorney.com/thomas-paine-on-to-washington/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>arizona lawsuit is it right?</title>
		<link>http://typeofattorney.com/arizona-lawsuit-is-it-right/</link>
		<comments>http://typeofattorney.com/arizona-lawsuit-is-it-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 23:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lawsuit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insanity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Many People]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://typeofattorney.com/?p=1203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Insanity, that is what many people think about the lawsuit of the federal government going against the Constitution, this is truly states rights vs the tenth amendment, what side will you come down on?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insanity, that is what many people think about the lawsuit of the federal government going against the Constitution, this is truly states rights vs the tenth amendment, what side will you come down on?</p>
<p><object width="5000" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0t9a3_yToyc&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0t9a3_yToyc&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="385"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://typeofattorney.com/arizona-lawsuit-is-it-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme court upholds Americans Rights</title>
		<link>http://typeofattorney.com/supreme-court-upholds-americans-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://typeofattorney.com/supreme-court-upholds-americans-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lawsuit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Class Actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazing Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://typeofattorney.com/?p=1129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To keep and bear arms, states rights, border control, immigration, are just a few of the things that are becoming lawsuits daily&#8230; The supreme court upholds the right of Americans to be An American. You have to wonder about the status of this country when we have to go to court to obtain the rights [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To keep and bear arms, states rights, border control, immigration, are just a few of the things that are becoming lawsuits daily&#8230;</p>
<p>The supreme court upholds the right of Americans to be An American. You have to wonder about the status of this country when we have to go to court to obtain the rights guaranteed in the constitution, a body of law that has been in place for many years and this body of law that so many liberals, are trying to trample on.</p>
<p>Imagine a world where, only criminals have protection against harm from other people.</p>
<p>If the liberals have their way, only criminals will have guns&#8230;</p>
<p>This is really scary and it is not the American way.</p>
<p>Now we have two additional lawsuits, challenging unconstitutional bans of guns, in large American cities where only crooks have guns, amazing stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://typeofattorney.com/supreme-court-upholds-americans-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New legal standards?</title>
		<link>http://typeofattorney.com/new-legal-standards/</link>
		<comments>http://typeofattorney.com/new-legal-standards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 14:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lawsuit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oppression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Willingness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wrongful detainer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://typeofattorney.com/?p=981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are we looking at a new legal standard or is this just some strange and ignorant past life experience. This video is disturbing, because it shows a willingness to violate the rights of the people&#8230; The constitution, the real life standard of all the law&#8230; You know this is perhaps one of the most insidious [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we looking at a new legal standard or is this just some strange and ignorant past life experience.</p>
<p>This video is disturbing, because it shows a willingness to violate the rights of the people&#8230;</p>
<p>The constitution, the real life standard of all the law&#8230;</p>
<p>You know this is perhaps one of the most insidious things I can remember seeing.</p>
<p><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bB_jp3Sm1BY&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bB_jp3Sm1BY&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://typeofattorney.com/new-legal-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal rights do illegal aliens have rights?</title>
		<link>http://typeofattorney.com/legal-rights-do-illegal-aliens-have-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://typeofattorney.com/legal-rights-do-illegal-aliens-have-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 20:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lawsuit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[get an attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Embed Src]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hl En]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Http Www Youtube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal Aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Param Name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[True Width]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type Application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X Shockwave Flash]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://typeofattorney.com/?p=948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[question if you found yourself in cuba, do you think you would have rights?  Or would you just be jailed&#8230; That one is easy, It appears that the digits in washington have some strange notion about the constitution, i.e. they dont know it exists.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>question if you found yourself in cuba, do you think you would have rights?  Or would you just be jailed&#8230;</p>
<p>That one is easy,</p>
<p>It appears that the digits in washington have some strange notion about the constitution, i.e. they dont know it exists.</p>
<p><object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/OHuQaett160&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/OHuQaett160&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://typeofattorney.com/legal-rights-do-illegal-aliens-have-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Merry Christmas drive a liberal crazy</title>
		<link>http://typeofattorney.com/merry-christmas-drive-a-liberal-crazy/</link>
		<comments>http://typeofattorney.com/merry-christmas-drive-a-liberal-crazy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lawsuit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Class Actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car wrecks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amendment To The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas Drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress Shall Make No Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution Of The United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution Of The United States Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Document Write]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Establishment Of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Members]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment To The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Exercise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom Of Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merry Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redress Of Grievances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Freedom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://typeofattorney.com/?p=610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can have a Merry Christmas and guess what the constitution allows you the freedom to do that. Yes, Virginia, you can celebrate CHRISTmas. I know it is so last century, but guess what, it is the reason for the season and in this United States of America, we still are free under the constitution, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can have a Merry Christmas and guess what the constitution allows you the freedom to do that.</p>
<p>Yes, Virginia, you can celebrate CHRISTmas.   I know it is so last century, but guess what, it is the reason for the season and in this United States of America, we still are free under the constitution,</p>
<p>The First Amendment to the Constitution of the united states of america.<br />
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.</p>
<p>For millions of Americans all over the world, freedom is worth it all, many of us have sacrificed, family members, for our freedom, sacrificed our childhood, for the freedom you enjoy, it is this freedom that allows, many the freedom to carry a sign around, so make a liberal crazy and wish them a merry Christmas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://typeofattorney.com/merry-christmas-drive-a-liberal-crazy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where are all the constitutional lawyers?</title>
		<link>http://typeofattorney.com/where-are-all-the-constitutional-lawyers/</link>
		<comments>http://typeofattorney.com/where-are-all-the-constitutional-lawyers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lawsuit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aclu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Butts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fire With Fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politician]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stupid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trample]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://typeofattorney.com/?p=584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazing stuff, but is it for real??? ON a recent show the famous Rush Limbaugh, was asked a question about why we did not have any litigation in all these constitutional issues that appear to be taking place with the current administration, he never answered the question in stead he just ignored it, I have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing stuff, but is it for real???</p>
<p><strong>ON a recent show the famous Rush Limbaugh,</strong></p>
<p> was asked a question about why we did not have any litigation in all these constitutional issues that appear to be taking place with the current administration, he never answered the question in stead he just ignored it, I have to wonder why the vaunted verbalist, choose not to answer the question and why?</p>
<p>One thing for sure, when the ACLU attempts to file a lawsuit the WH appears to feel the need to immediately comply. </p>
<p><strong>So one question, why is the GOP sitting on its collective Butts,)</strong></p>
<p>You fight fire with fire, since congress is determined to trample on the constitution of these United states of america, then someone should be standing up for the constitution, like attorneys, for instance. </p>
<p>So what is going on are we no longer under the constitution?</p>
<p>Have we forgotten where we come from?</p>
<p>When a politician says anything to get elected, and then later lies about everything, that is a real problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://typeofattorney.com/where-are-all-the-constitutional-lawyers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What side are you on?</title>
		<link>http://typeofattorney.com/what-side-are-you-on/</link>
		<comments>http://typeofattorney.com/what-side-are-you-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lawsuit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Class Actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aclu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Stream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scary Situation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stream America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://typeofattorney.com/?p=644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So should we allow the constitution to be trod upon? We see the world is not as safe as it used to be, some allegedly say that the ACLU could be part of the problem, are you supporting them? If you are demand they take action concerning all aspects of legal problems involving the poor [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So should we allow the constitution to be trod upon?</p>
<p>We see the world is not as safe as it used to be, some allegedly say that the ACLU could be part of the problem, are you supporting them?  If you are demand they take action concerning all aspects of legal problems involving the poor and the indigent, not just those issues that are to the left of main stream america&#8230;</p>
<p>That is a scary situation&#8230;</p>
<p><object width="320" height="265"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ym3skeZCixw&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ym3skeZCixw&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://typeofattorney.com/what-side-are-you-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTC tries an end run around the constitution</title>
		<link>http://typeofattorney.com/ftc-tries-an-end-run-around-the-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://typeofattorney.com/ftc-tries-an-end-run-around-the-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lawsuit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflicts Of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endorsements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freebies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ftc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Interest Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testimonials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://typeofattorney.com/?p=523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So what is next, will the political parties have to reveal when they pay liberal bloggers to post? or will those people be exempt? Will they publish who pays them for what? Folks it is a great time to be a constitutional lawyer, because we are looking at yet another case in the works. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what is next, will the political parties have to reveal when they pay liberal bloggers to post?<br />
or will those people be exempt?</p>
<p>Will they publish who pays them for what?</p>
<p>Folks it is a great time to be a constitutional lawyer, because we are looking at yet another case in the works. </p>
<p>The Federal Trade Commission will require bloggers to clearly disclose any freebies or payments they get from companies for reviewing their products.</p>
<p>It is the first time since 1980 that the commission has revised its guidelines on endorsements and testimonials, and the first time the rules have covered bloggers.</p>
<p>But the commission stopped short today of specifying how bloggers must disclose any conflicts of interest.</p>
<p>The FTC said its commissioners voted, 4-0, to approve the final guidelines, which had been expected. Penalties include up to $11,000 in fines per violation.</p>
<p>The rules take effect Dec. 1.</p>
<p><a href="http://thedanashow.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/ftc-meddles-in-blogger-content-free-speech/">source </a></p>
<p>Is the world going insane, I tell you what I will tell all, if congress will tell all the payments they receive when a special interest group contributes to their PAC</p>
<p>How does that sound instead of picking on bloggers do you suppose that the FTC might be able to figure out how to stop the bernie madoffs of the world before picking on bloggers?</p>
<p>You really have to wonder about the people in office when they start doing stuff that is clearly unconstitutional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://typeofattorney.com/ftc-tries-an-end-run-around-the-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are we looking at a new boon for attorneys?</title>
		<link>http://typeofattorney.com/are-we-looking-at-a-new-boon-for-attorneys/</link>
		<comments>http://typeofattorney.com/are-we-looking-at-a-new-boon-for-attorneys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lawsuit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Class Actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney Firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incoming Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stupid Behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://typeofattorney.com/?p=481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is the very real possibility that this present administration at the white house is creating an environment where every outgoing administration will have to legally defend all its decisions after they leave office. That should scare the tar out of politicians and it should have good attorney firms gleefully rubbing their hands together thinking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is the very real possibility that this present administration at the white house is creating an environment where every outgoing administration will have to legally defend all its decisions after they leave office. </p>
<p>That should scare the tar out of politicians and it should have good attorney firms gleefully rubbing their hands together thinking about all the fees that will come from this type of dare I say it, Stupid behavior.</p>
<p>Amazing but true, is the current white house setting up the case where americans will have to pay for the defense of politicians in office that have to defend their decisions, if the next incoming administration does not agree with what they did.</p>
<p>That my friends is crazy but if that is the way they want to go, what is the penalty for violating the constitution?</p>
<p>Is that going to be criminal, Civil, some where in between?</p>
<p>Will eric holder be prosecuted?  will the white house be prosecuted for allowing the constitution to be violated?</p>
<p>This just makes no sense at all and a lot of people think this is just not the right way to go for the white house.</p>
<p>This is more important when you think about what is going on, they want to pass a health care reform plan but they cannot even accurately run a cash for clunkers program, that was an alleged failure.</p>
<p>Do they really want to do this?   Do they want to play this game?  because there are some including blago that seem to think that this is something that democrats do not really want to do because of some of the things in their past and some of the things they are doing behind the scenes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://typeofattorney.com/are-we-looking-at-a-new-boon-for-attorneys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
