ATT and Tmobile?
Is google about to make a huge mistake?
Over the last few months Google has been quietly and allegedly terminating accounts, suspending ad words accounts, and doing so in a way that might actually be illegal?
Who would do something like that more so if your a company that says do no evil?
One thing may be about to change and it is something that you should be very aware about.
In so many ways, big corporate business is strangling the life out of the internet.
They are forcefully creating a situation where only large companies with more money to spend on advertising can be successful.
This is wrong…
When only large corporations are afforded the ability to advertise and the regular public as well as small business (mom and pop) business are excluded this is wrong.
In so many ways, allegedly google has done more evil than anyone even realizes, (allegedly)
Categories: American Bar Association, Class Actions, cyber law Tags: Angry Customers, Att, Attempts, Consumers, Fear, Google, Google Search, Hot Potato, Jerks, Merger, One Thing, People, Reputation, Retribution, Simple Fact, Slob, Tmobile, Vip
Credit card law
Do you have credit cards? Are you in debt, then you need to fully understand the way this thing works…
Recently the president signed into law a whole new set of rules for credit card companies, many are saying that it is very unfair to those people who have good credit, however, it seems only logical that the credit system is basically broken as it is and this new law does nothing to help.
The new credit laws, do not really do much to help the consumer as it allow the credit card companies to penalize those people who pay their bills on time.
The problem here is that people that have credit cards and dont really need them will not pay for service fees and extra fees.
They will just terminate them with prejudice.
It is the old adage, those who need credit, cant get credit and those that dont need credit can get all they want and more.
Does this make any sense at all?
No, actually it does not make any sense at all, however these companies will do just that, they will start out sending out increases in fees annual fees and more.
Which will result in consumers just canceling the card and paying in cash.
After all they dont need the credit, it is just those people that need credit that will pay the fees, so how is this going to help the market?
The answer is that it will not help the market at all.
It is just another law that is not needed and will cause problems down the road.
Just wait and see…
Categories: Uncategorized Tags: Card, Consumers, Credit, Credit Card Companies, Credit Cards, Credit Laws, Extra Fees, Loans, New Law, New Laws, Old Adage, People Cards, Prejudice, Secured
Dictionary of Legal Terms
Want to know more about the legal system then this is for you.
Want to know more about things that will some day effect your pay?
Want to have a better understanding of why you may need this book some day?
- ISBN13: 9780764139215
- Condition: USED – GOOD
- Notes:
Product Description
Updated to include new terms such as “civil union” and to incorporate recent changes in laws and judicial interpretations, this handy dictionary cuts through the complexities of legal jargon and presents definitions and explanations that can be understood by non-lawyers. Approximately 2,500 terms are given with definitions and explanations for the benefit of consumers, business proprietors, legal beneficiaries, investors, property owners, litigants, and all othe… More >>
Categories: family law Tags: Beneficiaries, Benefit, Business Investors, Business Proprietors, Civil Union, Complexities, Consumers, Definitions, Dictionary, Dictionary Of Legal Terms, Explanations, Handy Dictionary, Judicial Interpretations, Lawyers, legal, Legal Jargon, Litigants, Presents, Product Description, Property Owners, Terms
License files can put you out of business
License file restrictions and how they can kill your business.
Over the last few years, it has become popular to provide a cornucopia of different restrictive license agreements, these terms of use, tend to represent only one side of the agreement and that this the provider side of the agreement.
In reality there are always two sides to every agreement.
However most of the time these agreements are made up by lawyers who represent only one side and that is the provider side of the agreement, leaving the consumer out of the equation.
Consumers or buyers have rights yet for the most part these restrictive license agreements do not acknowledge consumer rights at all, this is a problem because of how these agreements tend to bend and then break the law of the land.
There has been a steadily growing number of companies that are moving to these restrictive license agreements, to the point that these license agreements have begun to impinge on the rights of buyers, some of these agreements even state that the buyer has no rights.
Which makes the agreement null and void, from a legal standpoint.
When you deny the rights of buyers in an agreement then the agreement is of no value.
In one example a service provider that sells access to files, has such a restrictive license system that the buyer often becomes so confused and lost that the buyer just gives up and goes to another venue where they have a friendly licensing system, at least that is what is happening in many of these cases.
The funny thing is that these companies stand around wondering why their sales go down and wondering what they can do to get their sales back up again, yet they have no idea what the problem is, so how can you communicate the problems you have with a company that has overly reaching restrictions concerning license files.
Simple just stop buying from them, stop spending money and let them know why you are no longer a customer.
Credit card law
New Credit card rules, will they help or hurt?
Recently the president signed into law a whole new set of rules for credit card companies, many are saying that it is very unfair to those people who have good credit, however, it seems only logical that the credit system is basically broken as it is and this new law does nothing to help.
The new credit laws, do not really do much to help the consumer as it allow the credit card companies to penalize those people who pay their bills on time.
The problem here is that people that have credit cards and dont really need them will not pay for service fees and extra fees.
They will just terminate them with prejudice.
It is the old adage, those who need credit, cant get credit and those that dont need credit can get all they want and more.
Does this make any sense at all?
No, actually it does not make any sense at all, however these companies will do just that, they will start out sending out increases in fees annual fees and more.
Which will result in consumers just canceling the card and paying in cash.
After all they dont need the credit, it is just those people that need credit that will pay the fees, so how is this going to help the market?
The answer is that it will not help the market at all.
It is just another law that is not needed and will cause problems down the road.
Just wait and see…
Categories: Class Actions, credit card Tags: Array, Consumers, Credit Card Companies, Credit Cards, Credit Laws, Extra Fees, New Laws, Old Adage, People Cards, Prejudice
License file restrictions and how they can kill your business.
Over the last few years, it has become popular to provide a cornucopia of different restrictive license agreements, these terms of use, tend to represent only one side of the agreement and that this the provider side of the agreement.
In reality there are always two sides to every agreement and by law consumers have a right to be represented in a contract or agreement.
However most of the time these agreements are made up by lawyers who represent only one side and that is the provider side of the agreement, leaving the consumer out of the equation.
Consumers or buyers have rights yet for the most part these restrictive license agreements do not acknowledge consumer rights at all, this is a problem because of how these agreements tend to bend and then break the law of the land.
There has been a steadily growing number of companies that are moving to these restrictive license agreements, to the point that these license agreements have begun to impinge on the rights of buyers, some of these agreements even state that the buyer has no rights.
Which makes the agreement null and void, from a legal standpoint, it is like saying that you no rights when you agree to some of these agreements, some even state that you have to pay a fee, and then you can not use the product for which you have purchased.
When you deny the rights of buyers in an agreement then the agreement is of no value.
In one example a service provider that sells access to files, has such a restrictive license system that the buyer often becomes so confused and lost that the buyer just gives up and goes to another venue where they have a friendly licensing system, at least that is what is happening in many of these cases.
The funny thing is that these companies stand around wondering why their sales go down and wondering what they can do to get their sales back up again, yet they have no idea what the problem is, so how can you communicate the problems you have with a company that has overly reaching restrictions concerning license files.
Simple just stop buying from them, stop spending money and let them know why you are no longer a customer.
It is a fact that 80 percent of customers do not report why they stop being a customer of a business, so if the company does not realize why you are no longer buying from them how will they ever correct their bad behavior?
The truth is that for the most part down the road you can find another vendor that can offer you the same service without all the over restrictive license terms.
So the best advise you can get and take is to actually read the fine print, always know what you are agreeing to when you buy a product online.
is UPS also known as United Package Smashers?
Is UPS engaging in an alleged insurance scam? Or are they doing something different, some say they are allegedly paying insurance claims based on who you are and not on the circumstances of the claim.
After looking through several alleged complaints from consumers and seeing first hand what can happen
to packages at times using this service.
We did a search online for problems associated with UPS and its package delivery services.
There were a number of complaints which appear to be related to insurance and some have complained
that this is actually insurance fraud, however, that is alleged at this point, there may also be some
class action lawsuits out there that are in the process of being filed over the handling of packages.
The first thing that apparently happens is that your claim is automatically denied this is even before anyone
sees or inspects the package, which is dishonest at best and a lie at the worst.
But that is just an opinion, or is it, because we recently shipped a package which was returned by the consignee,
Stating that the unit had been damaged and in fact after we inspected the package it was in fact so damaged that
it did not even resemble the package that we shipped.
UPS stated that they would not cover any damage because it was not packaged according to their standards.
However, we did package the item according to the standards that they published and we found that this is
a common excuse for not paying a claim, we have pictures before and after, and you will not believe the mess
that they caused, and the condition of the package, it was obviously run over by a fork lift.
WHAT? you have to ask that right, ok someone hit my package with a forklift and caused about $400.00 in damages and
they say they are not going to pay for anything, they damaged the package beyond repair and feel no responsibility to
do anything, that is sick my friends.
UPS apparently is having many of these problems, with regard to how the packages are handled.
So we plan on filing suit in Federal Court for violations of the UCC Uniform Commercial Code in relation to possible fraud in insurance and regulations regarding
Why does UPS do its customers dirty and do they cheat their customers out of the service they claim they provide.?
Categories: bankruptcy, car wrecks, Class Actions, Constitutional Law, cyber law, family law, Getting a Lawyer, Internet Law, lawsuit, Type of Attorney, UPS lawsuits Tags: Circumstances, Class Action Lawsuits, Consignee, Consumers, Damages, Excuse, Forklift, Friends, Insurance, Insurance Claims, Insurance Fraud, Insurance Scam, Package Delivery Services, Regard, Uniform Commercial Code, United, Ups, Ups Delivery
ups package damage?
In recent research it would appear that there are a number of claims that are being routinely denied by UPS, consumers claim that it is routine for ups to deny claims based on the its not our fault its your fault premiss.
As well there are apparently a number of class action lawsuits in process against the company at this time which all revolve around the central theme of insurance claims.
In fact there are a number of websites dedicated to companies that have a lot of complaints against companies that engage in questionable acts in relation to insurance related complaints.
claims insurance
ups and other companies offer insurance at an additional charge which many consumers claim is something akin to fraud as they claim that these companies have no intention of paying these claims.
lawsuit and lawsuit
it is apparent that if you really want to get compensated for a damage claim you will have to go to court, which is an amazing thing in this day and age when the government is so involved in the activities of business.
shipping damage claims
there are thousands and thousands of damage claims every year a majority of them go unpaid and denied due to the policies of companies that routinely deny claims on the basis of improper packaging, which is crazy when you inspect a package and it is obvious that the package has been run over by a forklift.