In a move that is allegedly unconstitutional the FCC may one day be able to

end the internet freedom you enjoy today.

This is not constitutional and must be stopped, this is wrong in every conceivable way you can imagine.

In case your just now hearing this.

Stop this insanity help us challenge this by filing a lawsuit if necessary.

The FCC has no authority to govern or to regulate the internet.

The internet is made up of a number of private and some public servers, but it is not something that can be (taken over) this is wrong and it will be challenged in court.

This is a power grab of UN Godly proportions, folks this is not only evil but it is wrong, watch the stock market sink like a lead balloon.

If you have stock in the NASDAQ, you might consider moving it or liquidating it.

What they are attempting to do is nothing short of Fascism, (allegedly)

Stop this insanity help us challenge this by filing a lawsuit if necessary.

Taking over and regulating, Cable TV, Satellite TV, and now the Internet?

This past week, the FCC has grabbed more power that they have no constitutional authority to regulate.

Lawsuits must be filed by the largest ISPs right away challenging this or else freedom will be lost in this nation.

Lawsuits must be filed to challenge the constitutionality of this power grab, this must not be allowed to take place.

Cable companies need to file lawsuits.

Satellite Companies need to file lawsuits.

Did one judge go against more than 200 years of history and legal understanding?

I heard one person say that what has been done here, is about the same as treason, in fact if this judges decision had been handed down in the 16th century, the consequences would have been grave, perhaps even dire.

Legislating from the bench is allegedly the same as treason, and it is a shame on the profession.

When men are not willing to act to protect our constitution what are we to do?

They are throwing the constitution out the window, and they should be ashamed…

But they are not, they are disparaging our history, they should care but they do not…

Apparently our judges have forgotten what little they once knew about the constitution, are we even living in the US anymore?

The Tenth Amendment (Amendment X) to the United States Constitution, which is part of the Bill of Rights, was ratified on December 15, 1791.

The Tenth Amendment restates the Constitution’s principle of federalism by providing that powers not granted to the national government nor prohibited to the states by the Constitution of the United States are reserved to the states or the people.
source Wikipedia

As well please find some case law also from the wiki site, which is good reading for those judges that are too ignorant to understand case law.

It is amazing that we have one person that decides to over rule more than a decade of case law which is clear.

History and case law

The Tenth Amendment is similar to an earlier provision of the Articles of Confederation: “Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled.”[1] After the Constitution was ratified, some wanted to add a similar amendment limiting the federal government to powers “expressly” delegated, which would have denied implied powers.[2] However, the word “expressly” ultimately did not appear in the Tenth Amendment as ratified, and therefore the Tenth Amendment did not amend the Necessary and Proper Clause.

The Tenth Amendment, which makes explicit the idea that the federal government is limited only to the powers granted in the Constitution, is generally recognized to be a truism. In United States v. Sprague (1931) the Supreme Court noted that the amendment “added nothing to the [Constitution] as originally ratified.”

States and local governments have occasionally attempted to assert exemption from various federal regulations, especially in the areas of labor and environmental controls, using the Tenth Amendment as a basis for their claim. An often-repeated quote, from United States v. Darby, 312 U.S. 100, 124 (1941), source wikipedia site

It is amazing that we have morons, sitting in our court houses and they do not have handcuffs on.

Is there no justice any more? Can you be a judge and still make this kind of mistake?

What? No way, this is an outrage, that a judge in texas can make a ruling without any type of followup or even making a single phone call? Something is really bad wrong in the state of texas… Police forced the boy into the custody of his father and as it turned out, it was a really horrible mistake, You just have to wonder, what were they thinking…

You see the coverage and you see the boy, should not there have been some type of alarm bell going off in the minds of the police, they have no problem, disrupting, the lives of thousands of other texans, but when it comes to some low level judge suddenly, there can be no questions asked?

Insanity…

In texas the police can pull a frightened and obviously terrified boy who did not want to go with his father, but when it comes to fighting real crime…

Sort of makes you wonder what is going on in the law enforcement community…

Naturally, we understand that this an exception to the rule and we know that, but it just really makes you mad to watch how often the police get it wrong, and how often they could just use some common sense and there could be a very different result.

So really what is going on with this type of enforcement, you see how often people are going to jail for non violent crimes, while certain areas of most large cities, ( the south usually) are no fly zones.

Could it be that it is easier to pick on non violent suspects than to go after those gang banging buddies.

Could it be that it is safer to go after someone with a parking ticket than to go after a drug dealer?

Could it be that is is easier to take a child away from his mother than to make a phone call first?

You just have to wonder and you know it is a tough job, sure everyone understands that, but if they are going to do the job can they not do it the right way?

In the balloon boy case, we saw that sometimes the media is actually pulling the strings.

Now that sounds like insanity, right and it is.

Just like in the case where the media influences the outcome of an election or in the case where the media influences only for one side or the other, it can be wrong, however, when you have more than one side in any given situation then you have to realize that the media should in fact be subject to some regulation.

However, that being said, we need the media to report the truth even if sometimes they get it wrong.

Because if not for the media would we not be subject to the tyranny of small men?

We may not always agree with the way the media reports, some for liberals some for conservative but we need them and if we do not watch very carefully and defend the constitution of the United States of America then eventually we will be lost in a country that belongs to everyone but us.

It is time to push back, if you have been assaulted by alleged union members, call a lawyer, it is something that you really need to make sure you do, because this is insanity and it is just a matter of time before someone will put one of these alleged thugs down the hard way.

There is one thing that I have learned no matter how big and bad you think you are, someone will come along that is bigger.

So now we have bullies, that are beating up on old people,

OLD PEOPLE, COME ON FOLKS IF THIS

DOES NOT MAKE YOU MADE YOU ARE BRAIN DEAD.

Are we on the brink of insanity?

Recently we have seen some very unusual situations that defy the constitutional levity of america and
Over the last few months we have seen some very interesting legal situations that have arisen, in fact in a recent supreme court decision, a lower court was handed its arse in a hand-basket.

Legislation from the bench is not ethical nor is it constitutional.

You have to wonder about these types of situations, because as it is so often taught in law schools, the law is in the words not the thoughts or feelings of the judges.

Many attorneys are starting to realize that there is a need to challenge the constitutional legality of some of the recent decisions that have been made by this present administration.

This is a very disturbing situation however, the supreme court will be hearing more as we go along because it is apparent that the constitution is being trampled on by the government and it will be up to the legal community to do the right thing here and the right thing is also going to be the legal thing.

Will you be one of those attorneys that challenge the constitutionality of these recent judicial activism decisions that are headed to the supreme court?

Find books on the constitution here