What would happen if they decided to make war on the people of the United States…

Think about that for a moment. …

The war on Alcohol, turned out to be a disaster, in case your school does not teach this anymore, they called it prohibition, where all drinking was made illegal, thousands of people died, but not because they drank alcohol they died because of all the violence of trying to make people behave in a certain way.

Blindness was a common problem because of moonshine…

All this because of what a small group of people decided must be done, now we have something even stranger, we have alcohol that is legal and thousands of accidents and deaths caused by alcohol.

Yet, Swat, goes to homes of regular people who have done nothing wrong at all, they are not theives, they are not robbers, they do not get behind the wheel of their cars drunk or murder people using their cars, they do none of those things, yet those are the people going to jail, being treated like criminals when they are not.

Why is this happening?

Simple really, they realized that they could not win the war on drugs, because people just make more of those drugs, they decided that the only way that they could win was to attack the defenseless people.

You know the ones that do not Cary guns, the ones that do not steal or even commit a real crime.

They go after those people that are not likely to resist when they come in at 2AM in the morning with guns, and flash bangs, but if those people do not have guns and they do not resist why are we spending so much money on this war on the people?

Simple, its easy, there is little or no risk, to those brave officers.

(now I know there are some that are brave and they do hard work but some of these guys are cowards)

Not all of them by a long shot, but some of them, those that pick on regular people over crack dealers, that are on every street corner by the way…

When you look at it that way you have to think who is behind this thing anyway.

Its the people in the Congress, they are the ones behind this madness.

Perhaps its time to send a message to Washington, perhaps its time to send some of those senile senior senators home, because they are sitting there with no clue as to what is really going on in the world.

They sit there often half awake, and half asleep, often getting up and saying stuff that makes no sense at all, those are the ones that need to be voted out of office.

When you think about those people its not a hard decision to make.

Vote them out of office, those people that would make war on the people and leave violent street thugs alone those are the ones that need to be removed from office.

Think about a second thing here, drunks cause more wrecks, more problems, more death than any other drug out there, period, yet that’s legal.

Another thing you might want to consider is how much money is taken from Americans, as well consider this, it is estimated that nearly 33 percent of the prison population is in jail on possession related charges, costing billions of dollars, and that by the way is billions of dollars that we do not have to spend.

Most of these people given a choice would sit at home, and work a job, causing no problems at all, but that is not what is happening here at all is it.

This year when you vote, consider the possibility that Washington does need to be cleaned out and emptied out of those people that would make war on the people and leave the criminals alone.

That is what we need to do is to send a message to those creeps up in Washington, go home…

Vote them out of office.

Will Americans stand up for the constitution or will they fall?

In some ways we are watching a challenging of our constitution, by the far left, the idea that states do not have the right to protect its citizens, is absurd, however that would seem to be what we are watching in both Alabama and Arizona, Amazing stuff.

The Tenth Amendment states the Constitution’s principle of federalism by providing that powers not granted to the federal government nor prohibited to the states by the Constitution are reserved, respectively, to the states or the people.

The argument of the left, is that you don’t have the right to ask for identification if you suspect that someone is in your state illegally, however, we have to have a birth certificate if we want to do anything in this nation.

It is like the camel and the eye of the needle analogy, the liberals seem to think that the constitution does not apply to them because they are so smart.

Amazing Washington seems to have forgotton where they came from

Remember this news story…

Well it took (allegedly) ATT months to stop advertising the benefits they hoped to get from that company, however, ATT is like a slow moving behemoth.

They have huge backbone resources, many of them mobile, but why cant they seem to keep up with the latest and the greatest?

Will we be better off when only one remains, when less competition, remember how it was like back in the days when you could get a cell phone bill for like 1200.00 per month, probably not, but it was really high in the beginning, simply because there was no competition.

When there is no competition the one thing that is clear is that corporations will get greedy and they will take advantage.

Well it might be that ATT may not be able to take over Tmobile in its attempts to obtain a better network.

One thing seems to be clear, allegedly most Tmobile users do not want to have anything to do with ATT, why is that?

For one thing ATT has a reputation of not providing very good service, just do a google search for angry, customers, and you will find millions of them. In fact, I was a customer of ATT for 5 years, paid them $79.00 a month without fail for 5 years, and what did they do when it came time to treat me better than say some slob they did not know jack about?

You got it they treated me like any other slob, but you have to ask how is that possible when I was a good customer for 5 years, in any other market I would be treated well even likely treated like a VIP, but not at ATT, at ATT your nothing your a big fat zero, your a number, and you know what else, people at Tmobile do not want to be treated that way and if I was with Tmobile and this (un-healthy) merger were to go through I would drop them like a hot potato.

The simple fact here is that this is why we have laws to protect consumers from large companies that would allegedly seek to do harm to its customers without fear of retribution because they are so big that they cannot fail, right?

Well one thing seems clear here Tmobile should not be ATT, Go find some other company to bully you jerks, hmm, alleged, jerks.

In the early days of this nations history, Georgia was originally a Penal Colony, in other wards a giant prison. Some people wonder if that has changed at all and even more of those people (allegedly about 34 percent of the population of Georgia is currently in jail) Which means that if you life in Georgia eventually you may end up in jail.

In many ways the way that people are treated in Georgia is allegedly a human rights violation.

It is a horror, show, and on top of that, the state of Georgia brings in Millions and Millions of dollars through the probation system.

Will you ever look at Taco Bell the same way again?

Will this case resolve the idea that in some cases at least the beef may not be what you think it is, (allegedly)

Is the Spin on with Taco Bell, Will Taco Bell do the right thing for its customers and investors?

For years, advertisers have taken liberties, with Truth in Advertising, is it now time to hold accountable advertising agencies and companies that allegedly do not play by the rules in its dealings with the public?

If more attorneys were advocates for the consumer we would have much better products in the US, I think it is very commendable of this Law Firm, to go up against a giant like this it really is like the story of David against Goliath.
(allegedly) we have for years and years been subjected to corporate fraud, (allegedly) by using questionable advertising methods, which little or no recourse by the people, here is our david and we are happy to see that someone is taking a stand against this kind of greed, (alleged)

In many ways, the idea that a kingdom divided against it self cannot stand is an accurate description.

So what is going on here, we have Washington that is fighting its own people by attempting to force them to do something they do not want to do, sure its for their own good, but where does it stop.

I want to know, where do you draw the line.

What about sugar, there are millions of diabetics, that are not allowed to have sugar but they do it anyway and sometimes they end up in the hospital, you know that costs a lot of money so since there are millions of people out there that do not know they are diabetic, then why not force the people to stop drinking soft drinks with sugar in them this way we can make sure that no one ever get sick and goes to the hospital ever again.

What about forcing them to stop reading a certain book?

What about offending someone, it might be a hate crime, lets just make it illegal to offend anyone.

What about, home owners insurance.

You know that they can force you to have car insurance now, and there are so many fires in a year where they either did not have insurance or they got behind on the payments, why not force them.

Kind of sounds like rape does it not?

That is what this is, forcing a people to do something that is against their will is not constitutional.

So we have now bi-partisan law, where one judge rules one way, and yet another judge rules still another way, based on how they feel.

Is that the law you studied?

Is that the hope and change you voted for?

I want to know because, if you voted to loose your freedom to choose then sadly someday someone will come along and remove your freedom to vote, want to guess what your life will be like then?

I am ashamed of Washington DC, and Congress, we do not live in a country where people are forced to do anything because a third party or special interest believes it is in their best interest.

America is not a country where its people will be forced to do things against their will.

Yet, we have Washington right now, they are appealing, a decision that is 100 percent correct, in the constitution, you cannot force a people who are free to buy insurance from specially designed “exchanges” that are run by special interests, such as some unions, this is not constitutional.

Health care is reform is one thing but this is just thinly disguised graft and corruption run by unions.

It is wrong and the people do not want it.

Did you know that for most people having a legal problem is something that they will face at least three times in their lifetimes.

Pre-paid legal plans promote preventive law.

Many people believe they need the services of a lawyer, under a pre-paid
legal service scheme, to solve a legal problem or resolve an intricate
situation. Often, your lawyer’s most valuable help could be before you
get involved in legal trouble.

When you sign up for a pre-paid legal plan, you have the right to unlimited
toll-free telephone access to your attorney.

The sound advice and consultation given to you by your lawyer will help you take the necessary
steps to detect and resolve any potential legal problems before they take more dangerous proportions.
This is called in legal jargon “therapeutic jurisprudence” or “preventive law”.

Just as preventive medicine helps prevent disease by detecting their symptoms, preventive law helps prevent
serious legal consequences by detecting early problems.

In an increasingly litigious society, there is real concern that assets you have worked long
and hard to accumulate may be attacked by creditors and litigants, through no fault of your own.
By the time a potential claim or liability is identified, it is too late to act.

A competent attorney’s advice is your best option to minimize your exposure
to potential risks and protect yourself from legal problems getting out of

How we are enslaving our own people just as our forefathers did
Modern systems theory provides a new method for the analysis of society through an examination of the structures of its communications. In this volume, Niklas Luhmann, the theory’s leading exponent, explores its implications for our understanding of law.

Luhmann argues that current thinking about how law operates within a modern society is seriously deficient. He lays out the theoretical and methodological tools that, he argues, can advance our understandin… More >>

Law as a Social System

You might think that in this day and age we were beyond the need for this but you know what we need it.

Legal Rights, 5th Ed.: The Guide for Deaf and Hard of Hearing People

An investment in real estate is always considered to be good as it often yields great returns in the future. Most of the people acquire properties or houses by availing loans from the banks. Builders usually say that their property is approved by the banks, and hence insist the customers to submit the documents to the banks. But, one should carefully verify the legality of the property before availing the loan from the bank.

The following are few important tips that help you in verifying the legality of a property. But before knowing them, know about different type of documents about which you should gain good knowledge when acquire a property or house.

Different types of documents in the property registration:

Agreement of sale: Documents pertaining to the agreement of sale include details about Vendors or Executants – individuals selling the property, Vendees or Claimants – individuals buying the property, and the details of the property. Here both the parties enter into an agreement in presences of witnesses to carry out the transaction for certain amount in certain period as per the laws of the land.

Sale Deed: A document which gives the purchaser the complete power and possession of the property by all means. In this, the vendor is the person who sells the property, and the vendee is the person who purchases the property. The vendor will transfer all the rights and grants over the property to the vendee by receiving the sale consideration amount which they had agreed upon. These documents should be registered in the sub registrar office by paying the stamp duty to the government.

General Power of Attorney (GPA): General Power of Attorney is a procedure through which a property owner transfers his powers and rights over a property to another person. GPA document includes the details of such proceedings. Such document has to be registered; only then the person on whom the powers and rights are transferred attains the right to execute all the transactions pertaining to that property in the future.

If the document is not registered, then the person on whom the powers and rights are transferred cannot execute the future transactions on his own; the original owner has to sign the document, only then the document gets the validation.

Agreement of Sale cum General Power of Attorney (AGPA): It’s a document in which the vendor agrees to sell the property to the vendee and transfers all his rights and powers over that property to the vendee. If the document is registered, the vendee gets all the rights to execute all the transactions over the property thereafter; if not he needs the consent of the vendor for future transactions.

Legal heir document: It is a document which should be duly attested by the class I magistrate to get complete validation. If the person on whom the property is registered dies without writing any Will, then the document which shows the legal rights holders on that property is “Legal Heirs certificate”.

All the members whose names are mentioned in the Legal heirs’ certificate should express their consent and sign the document; only then the sale of that property becomes valid.

Encumbrance Certificate (EC): EC includes all the details about previous registration including date of registrations, names of executants and claimants, document numbers etc. It can be obtained from the sub-registrar office.

All the above-mentioned documents must be properly verified and included in a property transaction.

Now let us look into other aspects when verifying the legality of a property:

1. Collect all the legal documents of the property for the last 20 years

2. The first point of the legal verification of the property is “the present vendor should be the previous vendee”.

E.g.:-
Document Registered In 2008 Document Registered in 2005
Vendor: P. Chandra Bose Ashok Kulkarni
Vendee: Anil Kumar P. Chandra Bose

If you see the above example, the present vendor Anil Kumar has got the document registered from P.chandra Bose in 2008, and P.chadra Bose has got it from Ashok Kulkarni in 2005 like so.

3. Please read the sale deed completely to clarify yourself that there are no mortgages created over that property by the vendor.
4. Please cross check all the past registration details with the Encumbrance certificate.
5. If any GPA or AGPA has been executed on the property, then check if they are registered or not.
6. Please check with the constructed area and the sanctioned area of the property by verifying them in the plan.
7. Take Certified copies (CC) from the registration office and check whether all the documents are valid or not.
8. Please cross check the plot number, house number and the boundaries of the property in the document and the existing ones.
9. Please collect property tax paid receipts and check whether they are paid regularly or not.

And last but not the least is to get a legal opinion from a advocate before going for a home loan to ensure a smooth loan processing.