Tort can be defined as

any wrongdoing for which an action for damages may be brought, generally you can bring a lawsuit for anything…

This is a no brainer, really, it is good for the insurance companies, and it is good for frivolous law suits, really no self respecting attorney would or even should be caught dead filing a frivolous lawsuit…

We need this in order to make health care reform work, without it, you can forget it..,

Tort Reform is needed, in fact it is something that is mandatory if we are going to find a path way to a good future.

Almost 70 percent of small business want tort reform in the health care bill yet, so far nothing…

Are you tired of hearing about how much congress wants to allegedly lie to you all the time?

Is it time for tort reform?

do you think we will see real tort reform or not,

Over this next judicial season, we are sure to see some history making case law coming forward for consideration both to the supreme court and in other litigation, tort reform is certainly part of that sensational history history in the making, even the most jaded of professionals cannot help but admit that tort reform is needed, however, the main issue is how to reform in a fair way?

In one way, large companies, can how weigh the law of averages against, doing the right thing, they can decide to let a failure continue knowing that they will not have to pay the price through litigation.

This is certainly a problem that should be considered even more so is the very real effect of frivolous law suits on this industry.

So punishment should be commensurate with the offense, as well as the ability of the offending party to provide a remedy…

Knowing there are two extremes here and finding the right balance between those two extremes will be the true test.

I can see both sides of this issue, there really should be punishment for large companies that just roll over the little guy on a regular basis simply because it is cheaper to pay the small percentage of lawsuits than it is to pay the larger claims process.

But in reality, if they were to practice a better methodology, would they not experience a lower cost of operation in the long run?  The idea that you should just calculate the value of a human life and just wait until the cost becomes too high too take action.

We have to wonder what these democrats are thinking will nancy P, be on the public health care plan?

Can you say a big fat NO.

The truth of this terrible plan is that if Ted Kennedy were on the public health care plan he would have died months ago, while this is a dramatic thing it is also a true thing, If Ted Kennedy were a normal american he would have been sent home to die.

As long as we have a double standard in this country how can we have true health care reform?

Question if we allow the white house to take over health care, will they (those that live in washing DC and are in congress, will have much better health care than you will)

The answer is no, they are going to have their health care program and we will have our health care program, because they do not care about us, they do not care if we live or die, as long as they can tax us they dont care.