judge illegeally blocks US constitution?
Did this just happen?
Did a Judge just Block the US constitution, in a case of the State of Alabama and its legal right under the constitution to pass and legislate, laws which is guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution, this is legal and the judge should know this yet, the judge took steps to attempt to block the tenth amendment to the constitution.
That my friends is a scary thing, because we know that this is not the American way, the American way is based on the constitution, it has been very well for the United States for over two hundred years.
This makes you wonder what kind of mentality would be required for a judge to make a ruling like this one, what kind of narcissism would be required for one man to rule that the will of the people be damned?
One man would be dictator to 300 Million people is that really the truth?
How is it possible?
When a man would ignore law in favor of personal opinion can that man apply legal principal to a case with real effectiveness?
When a man would be a dictator to the world how can that man ever be trusted to be a man of the will of the people or the will of the law?
How can the people trust the legal system when one man is willing to do things such as this at the bidding of his masters in Washington?
When politics dictate the motions of the law then all mankind looses.
When politics over rides the legal system then all the world is at risk.
When politics defeats the natural course of the will of the people then no one can ever be free again…
Will this judge be the dictator of the world?
Will this judge be ruled over by those in power?
Will this judge make up rules as he goes along?
Is this judge fit to be serving at all?
The answer here is clear, (allegedly) this man is unfit…
Who is in charge? the media or the sheriff
These days, we have to wonder with the news coverage the way it is, 24 hours of coverage, same story repeated over and over again, over and over, same thing, It makes you want to turn the TV off and just do something else.
In the balloon boy case, we saw that sometimes the media is actually pulling the strings.
Now that sounds like insanity, right and it is.
Just like in the case where the media influences the outcome of an election or in the case where the media influences only for one side or the other, it can be wrong, however, when you have more than one side in any given situation then you have to realize that the media should in fact be subject to some regulation.
However, that being said, we need the media to report the truth even if sometimes they get it wrong.
Because if not for the media would we not be subject to the tyranny of small men?
We may not always agree with the way the media reports, some for liberals some for conservative but we need them and if we do not watch very carefully and defend the constitution of the United States of America then eventually we will be lost in a country that belongs to everyone but us.
Wheel Chair Scams could this be the next big class action
Perhaps you have seen these commercials, showing an elderly person, very happy to have received their power “chaur” Â free from the insurance company but the reality of this often is a very sad situation where the elderly and disabled are taken advantage of by slick advertising and fast talking sales people, and in some cases even doctors that recently have been charged in federal related court cases.
There are several open cases that relate to this same issue
I know of one disabled elderly woman who ended up owing more than 2500.oo  to one of these companies you know where they say, if we approve you and your claim is denied its free.
Well, allegedly that is far from the truth and allegedly these people prey on the elderly if you have a loved one that has been taken advantage of by these very miss leading commercials then please contact an attorney, because this is a terrible and evil method of taking advantage of the elderly and the disabled.
Just google power chair scam and see how pops up. Â Â here seriously if you doubt me check it out right here.
In fact there are stories like this all over the US and there are many people that have been harmed by this, every time I see one of these commercials I think about the poor person on the other end of the phone that thinks they will actually get a free chair, and the truth is more than often a lie, there should be a sign at the end of the commercial,
YOU LIE,
Categories: Class Actions Tags: Advantage, Commercials, Court Cases, Doctors, Elderly Person, Elderly Woman, Google, Insurance, Insurance Company, Many People, Oo, People, Poor Person, Pops, Power Chair, Sad Situation, Scams, Truth, Wheel, Wheel Chair



fox news lies by omission
So is it fair?
Can there be a fair trial when you see websites like this one that are so convinced of what they “think” is the truth, the truth may be very different, the truth may not be known by even fox news, as good as they “think” that they are, they may be wrong, in fact the US justice system has been wrong in the past.
Can this girl get a fair trial at all?
When you have the media convinced of her guilt, most all of the bobble heads at fox news, and likely other news companies also, have said time and time again by action and by inference, that there are some issues that have not been addressed, do we not have a real working system of justice here?
Earlier we were witness, to a fox news commentator, that made a statement, about how they felt that the defense was trying to show a likely result.
There was no real fair and balanced view presented.
In fact there was only one view presented, that was the “we think that she is guilty view point”
When you look at the thought process, involved here you have to think about one thing and one thing alone, is this fair and is this balanced.
When you hear someone make a statement on national TV about how they think that the defense is trying to show reasonable doubt, and that there is no real reasonable doubt, (allegedly) they fail to make that correct impression, by only presented one point of view, it is not a fair thing to do, what if they are wrong, will they come out and apologize that they made allegedly stupid statements?
For example Phil Keating, talks about about what they “think” the defense is trying to do but he only makes one statement, that statement, is filled with invective, that calls for the conclusion of an alleged, verdict of guilty.
Just now on live TV, the bobble head, made the statement, of what the defense “hopes” to prove, this could be made differently you could say the defense may be trying to show that the use of a particular method of disposing of the body of a pet, might be something to consider in this case.
But they did not say that, they seem to be stuck using words that presume the idea of guilt.
You can use words to influence the thinking of anyone, for example while writing this article, I could use many different points or words to make a point, however, I choose to try to show a counter point, that is not happening on Fox news, the (Fair and balanced news company)
Is this fair and balanced coverage or is it just one sided?
Posted by lawsuit - July 28, 2011 at 8:48 pm
Categories: casey anthony, charlie sheen, Classic Media, criminal law, cyber law, evil doers, family law, florida injustice?, Foundation Press, get an attorney, Getting a Lawyer, gun control, Internet Law, is weiner a liar?, lawsuit, Lawsuit the Cops Tags: Bobble Head, Bobble Heads, Commentator, Conclusion, Correct Impression, Fox News, Guilt, Guilty View, Inference, Invective, Justice System, Live Tv, National Tv, Nbsp, Omission, Phil Keating, Point Of View, Reasonable Doubt, Stupid Statements, Thought Process, Truth