That seems like a really stupid idea.

Yet that is what the Music industry and the Motion Picture industry are trying to do.

So, what do they think?

That the internet will remain the same if they bribe congress to look the other way while they rape the internet in the name of commerce?

Is that what they really think?

I hope not because there are hundreds of thousands of websites like this one that would retire, disappear, go away, or go dark, simply because we are not going to pay for servers or pay for content or pay for videos or pay for anything that we do not have the freedom to control.

Simply said, we do not have to provide these websites, we do not have to provide content, we can take our websites and go home.

Sounds a little crazy, but that is what will happen, for 40 years, Holly wood and the broadcast media had a captive audience, they abused us with their ignorant programming, anyone remember the gong show, (think its gone away yet) try no.

The simply and drastic truth is that if holly wood has their way you will have to all watch re-runs for the rest of your life, imagine having to watch the Brady bunch for 12 hours a day…

Sure its funny for about a half hour, but after that, )

Seriously consider supporting an effort to vote out of office anyone that supports SOPA or PIPA any Senator, any Congressman…

The truth is that we cannot afford this kind of stupidity in congress and this is the number one reason why you should vote these crooks in congress out of office.

learn more about what you should avoid in legal bills in congress.

Sign the petition to stop this attempt at massive corporations to ruin the internet for everyone.

Sopa is a lie from the pits of hell…

It is Evil and must be removed in all its forms.

We cannot allow congress to pretend to pass laws that are in the interest of corporations but pretend to be in the interest of the people.

We know its a lie, they know its a lie, they are sorry, but not for the right reasons, they are sorry that they got caught not giving a damn.

some of which is certainly political in nature.

However, what seems really interesting is that you have a park in new york that is owned by a private citizen, and it has been unlawfully occupied by what can only be described as ruffians that are somewhat short of humanity.

Warning this picture could be offensive to some Americans.

occupy nothing

Are they really that stupid?

To look at this kind of ignorance, and know the truth all you have to do is know this one thing.

The Tea party political movement, actually went back to work after they gathered to protest spending and an out of control government.

Still the gravy train is about to stop on this issue as the city of new york has finally had enough, some worry about what might happen, other worry about riots, but the truth is that it is time to put an end to this.

Did a Judge just Block the US constitution, in a case of the State of Alabama and its legal right under the constitution to pass and legislate, laws which is guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution, this is legal and the judge should know this yet, the judge took steps to attempt to block the tenth amendment to the constitution.

That my friends is a scary thing, because we know that this is not the American way, the American way is based on the constitution, it has been very well for the United States for over two hundred years.

This makes you wonder what kind of mentality would be required for a judge to make a ruling like this one, what kind of narcissism would be required for one man to rule that the will of the people be damned?

One man would be dictator to 300 Million people is that really the truth?

How is it possible?

When a man would ignore law in favor of personal opinion can that man apply legal principal to a case with real effectiveness?

When a man would be a dictator to the world how can that man ever be trusted to be a man of the will of the people or the will of the law?

How can the people trust the legal system when one man is willing to do things such as this at the bidding of his masters in Washington?

When politics dictate the motions of the law then all mankind looses.

When politics over rides the legal system then all the world is at risk.

When politics defeats the natural course of the will of the people then no one can ever be free again…

Will this judge be the dictator of the world?

Will this judge be ruled over by those in power?

Will this judge make up rules as he goes along?

Is this judge fit to be serving at all?

The answer here is clear, (allegedly) this man is unfit…

Can there be a fair trial when you see websites like this one that are so convinced of what they “think” is the truth, the truth may be very different, the truth may not be known by even fox news, as good as they “think” that they are, they may be wrong, in fact the US justice system has been wrong in the past.

Can this girl get a fair trial at all?

When you have the media convinced of her guilt, most all of the bobble heads at fox news, and likely other news companies also, have said time and time again by action and by inference, that there are some issues that have not been addressed, do we not have a real working system of justice here?

Earlier we were witness, to a fox news commentator, that made a statement, about how they felt that the defense was trying to show a likely result.

There was no real fair and balanced view presented.

In fact there was only one view presented, that was the “we think that she is guilty view point”

When you look at the thought process, involved here you have to think about one thing and one thing alone, is this fair and is this balanced.

When you hear someone make a statement on national TV about how they think that the defense is trying to show reasonable doubt, and that there is no real reasonable doubt, (allegedly) they fail to make that correct impression, by only presented one point of view, it is not a fair thing to do, what if they are wrong, will they come out and apologize that they made allegedly stupid statements?

For example Phil Keating, talks about about what they “think” the defense is trying to do but he only makes one statement, that statement, is filled with invective, that calls for the conclusion of an alleged, verdict of guilty.

Just now on live TV, the bobble head, made the statement, of what the defense “hopes” to prove, this could be made differently you could say the defense may be trying to show that the use of a particular method of disposing of the body of a pet, might be something to consider in this case.

But they did not say that, they seem to be stuck using words that presume the idea of guilt.

You can use words to influence the thinking of anyone, for example while writing this article, I could use many different points or words to make a point, however, I choose to try to show a counter point, that is not happening on Fox news, the (Fair and balanced news company)

Is this fair and balanced coverage or is it just one sided?

The truth may be something very near to that, had she been a citizen would she even be in jail at all?
That is what seems to be of interest here because in many other cases where a Murder was confessed to by someone else the others that were not directly involved, received less time than Amanda Knox has already served, (allegedly)

So the fact remains, did Amanda Knox get caught up in this trial and jail time because she is an American with a president that does not have a strong foreign policy?

You have to wonder, if it is safe to even visit Italy these days, because you might end up with a parking ticket and have to do ten years in jail…

I know one thing for sure Italy is not American Friendly, at least not in this trial…

So one thing for sure if you must visit Italy make sure you have a lawyer on retainer.

Product Description
Lawsuits over coffee burns, playground injuries, even bad teaching: litigation “horror stories” create the impression that Americans are greedy, quarrelsome, and sue-happy. The truth, as this book makes clear, is quite different. What Thomas Burke describes in Lawyers, Lawsuits, and Legal Rights is a nation not of litigious citizens, but of litigious policies–laws that promote the use of litigation in resolving disputes and implementing public policies. This book i… More >>

Lawyers, Lawsuits, and Legal Rights: The Battle over Litigation in American Society

because of a national day of prayer, it is not constitutional, what? based on what lame argument?

Well it establishes a religion… err, well maybe it does?

Ok, lets say it does, name one, just one religion that has been established, because of one day  of prayer out of the year…

Im listening….

sorry I can hear your answer….

Well…..

Come on…..

Whats wrong you cant think of even one religion that has been established?

I will even give you all the years since 1952 to come up with one religion that has been established.

Whats wrong cat got your tongue? is something wrong, you dont seem to be saying anything…

You know why it is so silent, that is because the idea that religion is established by one day of national prayer is
not a sound argument, for one thing, they have failed, to mount an effective argument.

So what is up with that,
And that would be the truth, not one single religion has been established by having a national day of prayer…

NOT ONE SINGLE RELIGION….

Since 1952 there has not been one single religion that has been created or established because of a national day of prayer.

So what is next, will they declare that bibles are not constitutional?

And after that, will they start to burn churches, because they are not constitutional either?

Think about it folks, you see where this is headed right, when we have one person that tries, to make policy from the bench they effectively try to become a dictator from the bench, and that is not what the oath they swore to uphold.

When a lawyer, breaks his or her oath, they can be disbarred, which is sort of like a death sentence for the attorney.

So what happens when a judge breaks their oath? I tell you what should happen, is that judge should be removed from office.

I suggest that this needs to happen to this person that has done this, because her actions are illegal and unconstitutional.

This is more than a slippery slop, it is the worst nightmare of every free person in the world, when one person becomes a dictator from the bench, then the freedom of the world hangs in the balance.

It is Time, for these people to go, because they do not know the constitution, they do not know the law, and if they did would they dare, make this kind of decision and then try to back it up with nonsense?

Stupid, that is what it is, and we have better legal minds, in state college…

In the balloon boy case, we saw that sometimes the media is actually pulling the strings.

Now that sounds like insanity, right and it is.

Just like in the case where the media influences the outcome of an election or in the case where the media influences only for one side or the other, it can be wrong, however, when you have more than one side in any given situation then you have to realize that the media should in fact be subject to some regulation.

However, that being said, we need the media to report the truth even if sometimes they get it wrong.

Because if not for the media would we not be subject to the tyranny of small men?

We may not always agree with the way the media reports, some for liberals some for conservative but we need them and if we do not watch very carefully and defend the constitution of the United States of America then eventually we will be lost in a country that belongs to everyone but us.

There are several open cases that relate to this same issue

I know of one disabled elderly woman who ended up owing more than 2500.oo  to one of these companies you know where they say, if we approve you and your claim is denied its free.

Well, allegedly that is far from the truth and allegedly these people prey on the elderly if you have a loved one that has been taken advantage of by these very miss leading commercials then please contact an attorney, because this is a terrible and evil method of taking advantage of the elderly and the disabled.

Just google power chair scam and see how pops up.    here seriously if you doubt me check it out right here.

In fact there are stories like this all over the US and there are many people that have been harmed by this, every time I see one of these commercials I think about the poor person on the other end of the phone that thinks they will actually get a free chair, and the truth is more than often a lie, there should be a sign at the end of the commercial,

YOU LIE,